Chapter II - Products and Services Covered by the Government Procurement Survey

This survey covers government purchased products and services which fell under the following voluntary measures related to government procurement: "Procedures for Government Procurement on Products (Operational Guidelines)", "Measures on Japanese Public Sector Procurement of Telecommunications Products and Services", and the "Measures Related to Japan's Public Sector Procurement of Medical Technology Products and Services".

In other words, it covers in principle procurement contracts made by central government entities and public corporations given in the following Table A, and products and services of which value were above the threshold given below. *

From 1 April 1996 to 31 March 1998: 100,000 SDR (14 million yen)
From 1 April 1998 to 31 March 2002: 100,000 SDR (17 million yen)
From 1 April 2002 to 31 March 2004: 100,000 SDR (14 million yen)

*(Note1) Procurement for public works (including architectural planning and consultancy) is excluded from this survey.

Table A

Central Government Entities Public Corporations Independent Administrative Institutions
House of Representatives; House of Councilors; Supreme Court; Board of Audit, Cabinet; National Personnel Authority; Cabinet Office; Imperial Household Agency; National Public Safety Commission; Defense Agency; Financial Services Agency; Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Posts and Telecommunications; Ministry of Justice; Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Ministry of Finance; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare; Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry; Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport; Ministry of the Environment Water Resources Development Public Corporation; Japan Regional Development Corporation; Japan Green Resources Corporation; Japan National Oil Corporation; Japan Railway Construction Public Corporation; New Tokyo International Airport Authority; Japan Highway Public Corporation; Metropolitan Expressway Public Corporation; Hanshin Expressway Public Corporation; Honshu-Shikoku Bridge Authority; Urban Development Corporation; Japan Science and Technology Corporation; Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute; Japan Environment Corporation; Japan International Cooperation Agency; Social Welfare and Medical Service Corporation; Government Pension Investment Fund; Agriculture and Livestock Industries Corporation; Metal Mining Agency of Japan; Japan Small and Medium Enterprise Corporation; Postal Life Insurance Welfare Corporation; Labor Welfare Corporation; Employment and Human Resources Development; Okinawa Development Finance Corporation; National Life Finance Corporation; Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Finance Corporations; Japan Finance Corporation for Small Business; Housing Loan Corporation; Japan Finance Corporation for Municipal Enterprises; Development Bank of Japan; Japan Bank for International Cooperation; Teito Rapid Transit Authority; Japan Tobacco Inc.; Hokkaido Railway Company; East Japan Railway Company; Central Japan Railway Company; West Japan Railway Company; Shikoku Railway Company; Kyusyu Railway Company; Japan Freight Railway Company; Nippon Telegraph and Telephone CO.; Northern Territory Issue Association; Japan Consumer Information Center; Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute; RIKEN(The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research); The Pollution-related Health Damage Compensation and Prevention Association; Fund for the Promotion and Development of the Amami Islands; Japan Foundation; Japan Scholarship Foundation; Japan Arts Council; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; University of the Air Foundation; National Stadium and School Health Center of Japan; Social Insurance Medical Fee Payment Fund; Association for Welfare of the Mentally and Physically Handicapped; Japan Racing Association; Mutual Aid Association of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery Corporation Personnel; National Association of Racing; Farmers' Pension Fund; Japan Keirin Association; Japan External Trade Organization; Japan Motorcycle Racing Organization; New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization; Japan National Tourist Organization; Japan Institute Labor; Mutual Aid Fund for Official Casualties and Retirement of Volunteer Firemen; Corporation for Advanced Transport & Technology; Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private School; Organization for Workers Retirement Allowance Mutual Aid; National Education Center National Archives of Japan; Communication Research Laboratory; Institute of Fire and Disaster National Research; National Research Institute of Brewing; National Center for University Entrance Examination; National Institute of Special Education; National Olympics Memorial Youth Center; National Women's Education Center; National Youth Houses; National Children's Center; National Institute for Japanese Language; National Science Museum; National Institute for Materials Science; National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention; National Aerospace Laboratory of Japan; National Institute of Radiological Sciences; National Museum of Art; National Museum; National Research Institute for Cultural Properties; National Center for Teacher's Development; The National Institute of Health and Nutrition; National Institute of Industrial Safety; National Institute of Industrial Health; Center for Food Quality, Labeling and Consumer Services; National Center for Seeds and Seedlings; National Livestock Breeding Center; Fertilizer and Feed Inspection Station; Agricultural Chemicals Inspection Station; National Farmers Academy; Forest Tree Breeding Center; National Salmon Resources Center; National Fisheries University; National Agricultural Research Organization; National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences; National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences; National Institute for Rural Engineering; Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS); Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute; Fisheries Research Agency; Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry; National Center for Industrial Property Information; Nippon Export and Investment Insurance; National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology; National Institute of Technology and Evaluation; Public Works Research Institute; Building Research Institute; National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory; National Maritime Research Institute; Port and Airport Research Institute; Electronic Navigator Research Institute; Civil Engineering Research Institute of Hokkaido; Marine Technical College; National Institute for Sea Training; School for Seafarers Training; Civil Aviation College; The National Institute for Environmental Studies; Labor Management Organization for USFJ Employee; National Agency of Vehicle Inspection

(Note) This table lists up entities that existed in 2002.


1. Total Value and Number of Government Procurement Contracts

The total value for government procurements of goods and services for 2002 was 9,690 trillion yen, a decrease of 4.5% from the previous year. On the other hand, the total number contracts increased by 6.0%.

Table 1: Total value and number of government procurement contracts
(100mil. Yen or Number of contracts)
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Total value
(increase from the previous year, %)
9,640 10,922 10,296 10,431 10,146 9,690
(-1.2) (13.3) (-5.7) (1.3) (-2.7) (-4.5)
Total number of contracts
(increase from the previous year, %)
16,293 15,777 15,413 15,348 14,848 15,739
(14.0) (-3.2) (-2.3) (-0.4) (-3.3) (6.0)

2. Breakdown of Procurements by Type of Goods or Service, and by Contract Type (2002)

The ratios of open tendering contracts to single tendering contracts vary significantly according to whether the items procured were goods or services. In 2002 about 88% of the number of goods procurement was contracted through open tendering procedures. In contrast, in terms of service, almost the half of the number and nearly 70 % of the total value of procurement were contracted through single tendering procedures.

Table 2: Breakdown of procurements by types of goods and services, and by contract type
(Upper col.: Number of contracts, Lower col.: Value(100 mil. Yen))

Total Open tendering Selective tendering Single tendering
Goods 12,408 10,883 (87.7) 59 (0.5) 1,466 (11.8)

6,874 5,250(76.4) 145 (2.1) 1,479 (21.5)
Services 3,331 1,821 (54.7) 1 (0.0) 1,509 (45.3)

2,816 862 (30.6) 1 (0.0) 1,953 (69.4)
Total 15,739 12,704 (80.7) 60 (0.4) 2,975 (18.9)

9,690 6,112 (63.1) 146 (1.5) 3,431 (35.4)
(Note)Figures in parentheses: Ratio(%)

3.Trends in Procurement Breakdown by Type of Contract (5 year period)

In 2002, the open tendering keep occupying a large portion of the total, in terms of numbers of contracts, as well as on value basis. (About 80% on a number of contract base, and about 63% on a value base)


4. Grounds for Selective Tendering Procedures

The contracts through selective tendering procedures are decreasing each year. In 2002 the contracts through selective tendering are less than 1% of the total.


Table 4-1 Total number of selective tendering procedures (Number of contracts, )
1999 2000 2001 2002
Total 177(1.1) 68(0.4) 82(0.6) 60(0.4)
(Note) Figures in parentheses: Ratio(%)
Table 4-2 Reasons for selective tendering procedures (Number of contracts)
Reason 2002
Only a small number of suppliers is expected to tender because of the nature or the purpose of the contract 53
Use of open tendering is expected to be disadvantageous for procuring entities 7
Others 0
Total 60
(Note) Figures in parentheses: Ratio(%)

5. Breakdown of Grounds for Single Tendering Procedures

Of the reasons listed in the 15th Article of the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement as the conditions of single tendering procedure, the ones most often cited for the adoption of single tendering procedures were that " in the absence of tenders in response to an open or selective tendering," " a change of supplier would harm compatibility with already existing products or equipment," and that " when, for works of art or for reasons connected with protection of exclusive rights such as patents or copyrights, the products can be supplied only by a particular supplier." As in 2000 and 2001, these reasons accounted for more than 90 percent of cases.

Table 5: Reasons for use of single tendering procedures

Reasons 2000 2001 2002
Number of contract Number of contract Number of contract
Ratio (%) Ratio (%) Ratio (%)
In the absence of tenders in response to an open or selective tender 950 476 698
29.7 18.5 23.5
When, for works or art or for reasons connected with protection of exclusive rights such as patents or copyrights, the products can be supplied only by a particular supplier 981 772 749
30.7 30.1 25.2
When, for reasons of extreme urgency, the products could not be obtained in time by means of open or selective tendering procedures 59 84 68
1.8 3.3 2.3
The change of supplier would harm interchangeability with already existing products or equipment 1,131 1,159 1,380
35.3 45.1 46.4
When an entity procures prototypes or a first product which are developed at its request 54 67 65
1.7 2.6 2.2
Others 25 11 15
0.8 0.4 0.5
Total 3,200 2,569 2,975

6.Ratio of Foreign Supplier's Awards

In comparison to 2001, the ratio of foreign supplier's awards unchanged both in the number of contracts and in value basis in 2002.

Table6-1: Ratio of Procurement from Foreign Suppliers

(%)

2000 2001 2002

Procurement value Number of contracts Procurement value Number of contracts Procurement value Number of contracts
Ratio 6.9 2.7 4.4 2.6 4.2 2.1

Table 6-2: Nation's Origin in the Foreign Supplier's Award


Number Value(100 million yen)
USA 192 269.7
EU 111 129.0
Others 20 12.6
Total 323 411.2

7.Ratio of Foreign Tenders and Foreign Awards

In 2001, foreign suppliers' ratio is still low in that of both tenders and awards. However, foreign suppliers' ratio of contracts increases from 4.5% to 5.3%

(%)

Table7: Ratio of Foreign Suppliers' Tenders and Awards to them in 2002
Method for Procurement Contract Ratio of tenders(previous year) Ratioof awards or ratio of contract (previous year)
Competitive tendering procedures 0.6 (0.8) 1.3 (2.2)
Single tendering procedures - 5.3 (4.5)

(Note1)
Ratio of tender: The number of foreign tenders/The total number of tenderers
Ratio of awards: The number of contracts awarded to foreign tenderers/The total number of tenderers in selective tendering procedures
Ratio of contracts: The number of contracts made by foreign suppliers/The number of singletendering procedures

8.Proportion of Foreign Goods and Services

The ratio of foreign goods and services to the total value or number of contracts is almost the same level these three years. In 2002, foreign goods and services accounted for about 13.8 % of the total procurement spending, and 20.3 % of the total number of contracts.

Table 8: Ratios of Foreign Products and Services

(%)

2000 2001 2002
Procurement value 14.7(17.4) 12.0(14.1) 13.8(17.1)
Number of contracts 19.6(23.7) 19.2(23.3) 20.3(24.8)

[Note1] Figures in parentheses are for procurement of goods only.

9.Breakdown of Foreign Products and Services by Place of Origin

In 2002, products and services from the United States accounted for approximately 58 % on the value basis and about 45% on the number of contracts basis.

Table 9-1: Breakdown of foreign products and services by place of origin (value base)

(100 million yen, number, %)
Place of origin 2000 2001 2002
Procurement
Value
Procurement
Value
Procurement
Value
Ratio Ratio Ratio
USA 978.8 750.6 779.4
63.9 61.8 58.2
EU 321.2 277.0 366.5
21.0 22.8 27.3
Others 232.5 186.1 194.3
15.2 15.3 14.5
Total 1,532.5 1,213.8 1,340.2

Table 9-2: Breakdown of Foreign Products and Services by Place of Origin
(number of contract base)

(100 million yen, number, %)
Place 2000 2001 2002
Procurement
Value
Procurement
Value
Procurement
Value

Ratio Ratio Ratio
USA 1,496 1,386 1,445
49.7 48.7 45.2
EU 576 681 722
19.1 23.9 22.6
Others 936 779 1,032
31.1 27.4 32.3
Total 3,008 2,846 3,199

10.Procurement Value by Product and Foreign Ratios

Table 10 shows Japanese government procurement by product categories, which are further broken down into procurement value and ratios for foreign made products.
The total value of procurement of goods amounted to approximately 687.4 billion yen. The items that have large shares are "office machines and automatic data processing equipment" (personal computers, typewriters, projection screens, etc.), and "scientific and controlling instruments and apparatus" (binoculars, thermometers, voltmeters, micrometers, etc.)".
These three categories accounted for about 50% of total procurement value.
The category with the highest ratio of foreign products is "Mineral products" (soil and rocks, crude heavy oil, metal ores, etc.)(about 69 %), and "Aircraft and associated equipment" (aircraft, balloon, propeller, parachute, etc.)( about 62%).

Table 10: Total procurements by product (2001)
(100 Million Yen, %)
Products Total value
(difference
between 2000
and 2001)
Foreign share
(%)
Products from agriculture and from agricultural and food processing 0.9(0) 0.0
Mineral products 185.9(+4.0) 69.4
Products of the chemical and allied industries 31.2(+3.0) 29.5
Medicinal and pharmaceutical products 288.5(+15.4) 30.7
Artificial resins; rubber, raw hides and skins; leather; and articles thereof. 8.3(-21.7) 3.5
Wood and articles of wood; paper making material; paper and paperboard and articles thereof. 178.2(-19.6) 0.0
Textiles and textile articles; thread for spinning and weaving; and articles thereof. 96.1(+39.0) 0.0
Articles of stone, of cement and similar materials; ceramic products; glass and glassware; and articles thereof. 2.4(+0.9) 0.0
Iron and steel and articles thereof 139.1(+5.6) 0.2
Non-ferrous metals and articles thereof 34.4(-44.4) 1.1
Power generating machinery and equipment 134.7(+106.8) 7.6
Machinery specialized for particular industries 102.8(-2.1) 5.8
General industrial machinery and equipment 54.4(-35.4) 9.7
Office machines and automatic data processing equipment 2,206.2(-187.7) 12.3
Telecommunications and sound recording and reproducing apparatus and equipment 630.3(-540.8) 5.3
Electrical machinery, apparatus and appliances, and electrical parts thereof 197.6(-9.5) 12.8
Road vehicles 325.2(0) 0.8
Railway Vehicles and associated equipment 66.9(+43.8) 27.9
Aircraft and associated equipment 26.4(-28.6) 62.1
Ships, boats and floating structures 75.2(-49.7) 1.3
Sanitary, plumbing and heating equipment 6.6(-0.1) 38.2
Medical, dental, surgical and veterinary equipment 536.5(-41.3) 42.4
Furniture and parts thereof 58.3(-10.7) 1.8
Scientific and controlling instruments and apparatus 1,114.1(+253.3) 26.2
Photographic apparatus, equipment and optional goods; watches and clocks 120.5(+23.3) 11.2
Miscellaneous articles 253.6(-3.8) 8.1
Total 6,874.1(-500.4) 17.1

11.Procurement Value by Service Type and Foreign Ratios

Table 11 shows government procurement by service categories (value basis) and presents the ratio of foreign services.
Total procurement amounted to 281.1 billion yen and 75 % (210.0 billion yen) of total is shared by "Computer and related services," (computer programming, data processing, etc.).
The categories with the highest ratio of foreign services are "Courier services" "Telecommunications services" and "Air transport services".

Table 11: Total procurements by types of services(2001)
(Units: 100 million yen, %)
Category Total value
(difference
between 2000
and 2001)
Foreign
Share
(%)
Maintenance and repair services of motor vehicles 0.0(-0.4) 0.0
Maintenance and repair services of motorcycles and snowmobiles 1.1(+1.1) 0.0
Other land transport services (except Mail transportation by land) 61.9(-11.3) 0.0
Rental services of sea-going vessels with operator 10.4(-1.8) 0.0
Rental services of non-sea-going vessels with operator 1.7(+1.5) 0.0
Air transport services (except Mail transportation by air) 7.1(0) 8.4
Freight transport agency services 5.2(+0.4) 0.0
Courier services 0.4(+0.4) 47.9
Telecommunications services 45.2(+8.9) 9.2
Computer and related services 2,099.6 (+140.7) 7.4
Market research and public opinion polling services 10.1(+0.5) 0.0
Advertising services 117.4(-58.6) 0.0
Armored car services 15.8(+5.4) 0.0
Building-cleaning services 162.2(+25.0) 0.0
Publishing and printing services 56.1(-3.7) 0.0
Repair services incidental to metal products, machinery and equipment 86.4(-0.3) 6.7
Sewage and refuse disposal, sanitation and other environmental protection 23.0(-5.8) 0.0
Other 112.4 0.0
Total 2,816.0(+44.1) 5.9

12. Procurement Contracts by Product and Foreign Ratios

Table 12 shows procurement by product categories and foreign product ratios.

The total number of product procurement amounted to 12,408, and the category of "photographic apparatus and equipment optical goods, and clocks" (film, cameras, projectors, chronometers, etc.), accounted for the largest share of about 23% of the total.

The categories with high foreign shares are "Mineral products" (soil and rocks, crude heavy oil, metal ores, etc.) and " Aircraft and associated equipment".

Table 12: Number of Procurement Contracts by Product Categories(2001)
(Units: number of contracts, %)
Products Total
Number
(difference
between 2000
and 2001)
Foreign
Ratio
Products from agriculture and from agricultural and food processing 2(0) 0.0
Mineral products 937(+86) 90.0
Products of the chemical and allied industries 139(-57) 7.2
Medicinal and pharmaceutical products 1,952(+79) 30.1
Artificial resins; rubber raw hides and skins; leather; and articles thereof. 35(-12) 2.9
Wood and articles of wood; paper making material; paper and paperboard and articles thereof. 378(+11) 0.0
Textiles and textile articles; thread for spinning and weaving; and articles thereof. 178(+39) 0.0
Articles of stone, of cement and similar materials; ceramic products; glass and glassware; and articles thereof. 3(0) 0.0
Iron and steel and articles thereof 56(-5) 1.8
Non-ferrous metals and articles thereof 57(-14) 1.8
Power generating machinery and equipment 216(+191) 1.4
Machinery specialized for particular industries 114(-16) 11.4
General industrial machinery and equipment 267(+2) 2.2
Office machines and automatic data processing equipment 1,107(+108) 10.1
Telecommunications and sound recording and reproducing apparatus and equipment 539(-96) 7.8
Electrical machinery, apparatus and appliances, and electrical parts thereof 259(+38) 8.1
Road vehicles 559(+122) 0.5
Railway vehicles and associated equipment 30(+19) 10.0
Aircraft and associated equipment 32(-3) 56.3
Ships, boats and floating structures 27(+4) 3.7
Sanitary, plumbing and veterinary equipment 19(-10) 5.3
Medical, dental, surgical and veterinary equipment 736(-67) 33.3
Furniture and parts thereof 262(-30) 0.8
Scientific and controlling instruments and apparatus 1,281(+266) 38.6
Photographic apparatus, equipment and optical goods; watches and clocks 2,878(-32) 21.6
Miscellaneous articles 345(+68) 14.8
Total 12,408(+691) 24.8


13.Procurement Contracts by Service Type and Foreign Ratios

Table 13 shows government procurement by service categories on contract basis and foreign service ratios.
The number of contracts amounted to 3,331 and about a half of total is "Computer and related services." (computer programming, data processing, etc.)

Table 13: Number of procurement contracts by type of services(2001)
(Units: number of contracts, %)
Services Contracts
(difference
between
2000 and
2001)
Foreign
Ratio
Maintenance and repair services of motor vehicles 1(0) 0.0
Maintenance and repair services of motorcycles and snowmobiles 2(+2) 0.0
Other land transport services (except Mail transportation by land) 119(-13) 0.0
Rental services of sea-going vessels with operator 10(0) 0.0
Rental services of non-sea-going vessels with operator 1(0) 0.0
Air transport services (except Mail transportation by air) 13(+3) 7.7
Freight transport agency services 7(-1) 0.0
Courier services 2(+2) 50.0
Telecommunications services 71(-48) 9.9
Computer and related services 1,829(+404) 5.7
Market research and public opinion polling services 17(-14) 0.0
Advertising services 180(-69) 0.0
Armored car services 61(+28) 0.0
Building-cleaning services 493(+58) 0.0
Publishing and printing services 137(+14) 0.0
Repair services incidental to metal products, machinery and equipment 185(+16) 2.2
Sewage and refuse disposal, sanitation and other environmental protection 102(-2) 0.0
Total 3,331(+200) 3.5


14.Utilization of Overall-Greatest-Value Evaluation Method (OGV)

The voluntary measures (Procedures for Government Procurement of Products [Operational Guidelines]) encourage the adoption of the Overall-Greatest-Value evaluation method (OGV) where the lowest-price-award method is deemed inadequate. In addition, in the areas of computer products and services, telecommunications products and services, and medical technology products and services, when large procurement of over 800,000 SDR is conducted, it is obligatory in the voluntary measures to apply the OGV.
In 2002, the OGV was adopted in 656 procurements, representing about 4 % of total procurement. Of these contracts, 140 were awarded to foreign products and services.

Table 14: Implementation of Overall-Greatest-Value Evaluation Method
(Figures in parentheses are percentages)

Number of contracts
2000 2001 2002
Contracts
on a
domestic/
foreign
basis
Domestic
products and
services
434 558 516
Foreign
products and
services
123 187 140
Total 557 745 656
Ratio(%) 3.6 5.0 4.2

15.Response to Requests for Comments

Responses to pre-bid requests for submission of materials and comments on draft specifications are illustrated in Table 15-1 and Table 15-2.

Table 15-1: Response to Requests for Submission of Materials
(Number of responses)

2000 2001 2002
Only Japanese
suppliers answered
174 258 261
Only foreign
suppliers answered
7 9 0
Both sides answered 78 94 79
Neither sides
answered
7 24 5
Total 266 385 345

Table 15-2: Response to Requests for Comments on Draft Specifications
(Number of responses)

2000 2001 2002
Only Japanese
suppliers answered
263 393 421
Only foreign
suppliers answered
10 15 3
Both sides
answered
140 129 108
Neither sides
answered
28 52 47
Total 441 589 579

16.Average Period for the Receipt of Tenders

Under the current WTO Agreement on Government Procurement, the period for receiving tenders from the date of publication of the Notice of Invitation to Tender is set at a minimum of 40 days. In addition, a Japanese Government voluntary measure, "Understanding on Government Procurement" issued in November 1991 stipulates that the period should be no less than 50 days.
Table 16 shows that the period of 50 days has been secured.

Table 16: Average period for the receipt of tenders
(days)

2000 2001 2002
Average period for the receipt
of tenders
58.1 59.0 53.3

17.Government Procurement Seminars

In order to explain the planned procurement published in the official gazette (kanpo) in details, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and each procurement entity sponsors government procurement seminars at the beginning of, or as early as possible in, the fiscal year. (The Ministry of Foreign Affairs sponsored a seminar on April 26, 2002.)

Table 17: Attendance at Government Procurement Seminars

Classification 2000 2001 2002
Foreign
Ministry
Sponsored
Number of
domestic
attendants
69 111 92
Number of
foreign
attendants
31 33 28
Sponsored by
other entities
Number of
domestic
attendants
621 444 516
Number of
foreign
attendants
82 45 44
Total 803 633 680

18.Entities with Large Ratios in Procurement Values and in the Number of Contracts

Table18: Entities with large amount/number of procurement

(%)
Rank Number of contracts Value
1

Ministry of Health, labour and Welfare

(23.9)

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

(22.7)

2

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

(21.9)

Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Posts and Telecommunicationss

(20.2)

3

Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Posts and Telecommunications

(10.1)

Ministry of Finance

(11.8)

4

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport

(7.8)

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport

(10.7)

5

Defence Agency

(7.7)

Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Posts and Telecommunicationss

(5.9)

6

Ministry of Finance

(6.9)

National Police Agency

(2.5)

7

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

(1.7)

Japan Highway Public Corporation

(2.0)

8

Japan Highway Public Corporation

(1.6)

The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research

(1.6)

9

The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research

(1.6)

Defense Agency

(1.5)

10

Labour Welfare Corporation

(1.5)

Communication Research Laboratory

(1.3)

Note; ( ) means percentage in the total.



Index | Back | Next