This survey covers government purchased products and services which fell under the following voluntary measures related to government procurement: "Procedures for Government Procurement on Products (Operational Guidelines)", "Measures on Japanese Public Sector Procurement of Telecommunications Products and Services", and the "Measures Related to Japan's Public Sector Procurement of Medical Technology Products and Services".
In other words, it covers in principle procurement contracts made by central government entities and public corporations given in the following Table A, and products and services of which value were above the threshold given below. *
From 1 April 1996 to 31 March 1998: 100,000 SDR (14 million yen)
From 1 April 1998 to 31 March 2002: 100,000 SDR (17 million yen)
From 1 April 2002 to 31 March 2004: 100,000 SDR (14 million yen)
*(Note1) Procurement for public works (including architectural planning and consultancy) is excluded from this survey.
Table A
Central Government Entities | Public Corporations | Independent Administrative Institutions |
House of Representatives; House of Councilors; Supreme Court; Board of Audit, Cabinet; National Personnel Authority; Cabinet Office; Imperial Household Agency; National Public Safety Commission; Defense Agency; Financial Services Agency; Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Posts and Telecommunications; Ministry of Justice; Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Ministry of Finance; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare; Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry; Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport; Ministry of the Environment | Water Resources Development Public Corporation; Japan Regional Development Corporation; Japan Green Resources Corporation; Japan National Oil Corporation; Japan Railway Construction Public Corporation; New Tokyo International Airport Authority; Japan Highway Public Corporation; Metropolitan Expressway Public Corporation; Hanshin Expressway Public Corporation; Honshu-Shikoku Bridge Authority; Urban Development Corporation; Japan Science and Technology Corporation; Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute; Japan Environment Corporation; Japan International Cooperation Agency; Social Welfare and Medical Service Corporation; Government Pension Investment Fund; Agriculture and Livestock Industries Corporation; Metal Mining Agency of Japan; Japan Small and Medium Enterprise Corporation; Postal Life Insurance Welfare Corporation; Labor Welfare Corporation; Employment and Human Resources Development; Okinawa Development Finance Corporation; National Life Finance Corporation; Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Finance Corporations; Japan Finance Corporation for Small Business; Housing Loan Corporation; Japan Finance Corporation for Municipal Enterprises; Development Bank of Japan; Japan Bank for International Cooperation; Teito Rapid Transit Authority; Japan Tobacco Inc.; Hokkaido Railway Company; East Japan Railway Company; Central Japan Railway Company; West Japan Railway Company; Shikoku Railway Company; Kyusyu Railway Company; Japan Freight Railway Company; Nippon Telegraph and Telephone CO.; Northern Territory Issue Association; Japan Consumer Information Center; Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute; RIKEN(The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research); The Pollution-related Health Damage Compensation and Prevention Association; Fund for the Promotion and Development of the Amami Islands; Japan Foundation; Japan Scholarship Foundation; Japan Arts Council; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; University of the Air Foundation; National Stadium and School Health Center of Japan; Social Insurance Medical Fee Payment Fund; Association for Welfare of the Mentally and Physically Handicapped; Japan Racing Association; Mutual Aid Association of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery Corporation Personnel; National Association of Racing; Farmers' Pension Fund; Japan Keirin Association; Japan External Trade Organization; Japan Motorcycle Racing Organization; New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization; Japan National Tourist Organization; Japan Institute Labor; Mutual Aid Fund for Official Casualties and Retirement of Volunteer Firemen; Corporation for Advanced Transport & Technology; Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private School; Organization for Workers Retirement Allowance Mutual Aid; National Education Center | National Archives of Japan; Communication Research Laboratory; Institute of Fire and Disaster National Research; National Research Institute of Brewing; National Center for University Entrance Examination; National Institute of Special Education; National Olympics Memorial Youth Center; National Women's Education Center; National Youth Houses; National Children's Center; National Institute for Japanese Language; National Science Museum; National Institute for Materials Science; National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention; National Aerospace Laboratory of Japan; National Institute of Radiological Sciences; National Museum of Art; National Museum; National Research Institute for Cultural Properties; National Center for Teacher's Development; The National Institute of Health and Nutrition; National Institute of Industrial Safety; National Institute of Industrial Health; Center for Food Quality, Labeling and Consumer Services; National Center for Seeds and Seedlings; National Livestock Breeding Center; Fertilizer and Feed Inspection Station; Agricultural Chemicals Inspection Station; National Farmers Academy; Forest Tree Breeding Center; National Salmon Resources Center; National Fisheries University; National Agricultural Research Organization; National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences; National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences; National Institute for Rural Engineering; Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS); Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute; Fisheries Research Agency; Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry; National Center for Industrial Property Information; Nippon Export and Investment Insurance; National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology; National Institute of Technology and Evaluation; Public Works Research Institute; Building Research Institute; National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory; National Maritime Research Institute; Port and Airport Research Institute; Electronic Navigator Research Institute; Civil Engineering Research Institute of Hokkaido; Marine Technical College; National Institute for Sea Training; School for Seafarers Training; Civil Aviation College; The National Institute for Environmental Studies; Labor Management Organization for USFJ Employee; National Agency of Vehicle Inspection |
(Note) This table lists up entities that existed in 2002.
The total value for government procurements of goods and services for 2002 was 9,690 trillion yen, a decrease of 4.5% from the previous year. On the other hand, the total number contracts increased by 6.0%.
Table 1: Total value and number of government procurement contracts
(100mil. Yen or Number of contracts) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The ratios of open tendering contracts to single tendering contracts vary significantly according to whether the items procured were goods or services. In 2002 about 88% of the number of goods procurement was contracted through open tendering procedures. In contrast, in terms of service, almost the half of the number and nearly 70 % of the total value of procurement were contracted through single tendering procedures.
Table 2: Breakdown of procurements by types of goods and services, and by contract type
(Upper col.: Number of contracts, Lower col.: Value(100 mil. Yen)) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In 2002, the open tendering keep occupying a large portion of the total, in terms of numbers of contracts, as well as on value basis. (About 80% on a number of contract base, and about 63% on a value base)
The contracts through selective tendering procedures are decreasing each year. In 2002 the contracts through selective tendering are less than 1% of the total.
Table 4-1 Total number of selective tendering procedures (Number of contracts, ) | ||||||||||
|
Table 4-2 Reasons for selective tendering procedures (Number of contracts)
|
Of the reasons listed in the 15th Article of the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement as the conditions of single tendering procedure, the ones most often cited for the adoption of single tendering procedures were that " in the absence of tenders in response to an open or selective tendering," " a change of supplier would harm compatibility with already existing products or equipment," and that " when, for works of art or for reasons connected with protection of exclusive rights such as patents or copyrights, the products can be supplied only by a particular supplier." As in 2000 and 2001, these reasons accounted for more than 90 percent of cases.
Table 5: Reasons for use of single tendering procedures
Reasons | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 |
Number of contract | Number of contract | Number of contract | |
Ratio (%) | Ratio (%) | Ratio (%) | |
In the absence of tenders in response to an open or selective tender | 950 | 476 | 698 |
29.7 | 18.5 | 23.5 | |
When, for works or art or for reasons connected with protection of exclusive rights such as patents or copyrights, the products can be supplied only by a particular supplier | 981 | 772 | 749 |
30.7 | 30.1 | 25.2 | |
When, for reasons of extreme urgency, the products could not be obtained in time by means of open or selective tendering procedures | 59 | 84 | 68 |
1.8 | 3.3 | 2.3 | |
The change of supplier would harm interchangeability with already existing products or equipment | 1,131 | 1,159 | 1,380 |
35.3 | 45.1 | 46.4 | |
When an entity procures prototypes or a first product which are developed at its request | 54 | 67 | 65 |
1.7 | 2.6 | 2.2 | |
Others | 25 | 11 | 15 |
0.8 | 0.4 | 0.5 | |
Total | 3,200 | 2,569 | 2,975 |
In comparison to 2001, the ratio of foreign supplier's awards unchanged both in the number of contracts and in value basis in 2002.
Table6-1: Ratio of Procurement from Foreign Suppliers
(%) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 6-2: Nation's Origin in the Foreign Supplier's Award
Number | Value(100 million yen) | |
USA | 192 | 269.7 |
EU | 111 | 129.0 |
Others | 20 | 12.6 |
Total | 323 | 411.2 |
In 2001, foreign suppliers' ratio is still low in that of both tenders and awards. However, foreign suppliers' ratio of contracts increases from 4.5% to 5.3%
(%) | |||||||||
Table7: Ratio of Foreign Suppliers' Tenders and Awards to them in 2002
|
(Note1)
Ratio of tender: The number of foreign tenders/The total number of tenderers
Ratio of awards: The number of contracts awarded to foreign tenderers/The total number of tenderers in selective tendering procedures
Ratio of contracts: The number of contracts made by foreign suppliers/The number of singletendering procedures
The ratio of foreign goods and services to the total value or number of contracts is almost the same level these three years. In 2002, foreign goods and services accounted for about 13.8 % of the total procurement spending, and 20.3 % of the total number of contracts.
Table 8: Ratios of Foreign Products and Services
(%) | ||||||||||||
|
[Note1] Figures in parentheses are for procurement of goods only.
In 2002, products and services from the United States accounted for approximately 58 % on the value basis and about 45% on the number of contracts basis.
Table 9-1: Breakdown of foreign products and services by place of origin (value base)
(100 million yen, number, %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 9-2: Breakdown of Foreign Products and Services by Place of Origin
(number of contract base)
(100 million yen, number, %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 10 shows Japanese government procurement by product categories, which are further broken down into procurement value and ratios for foreign made products.
The total value of procurement of goods amounted to approximately 687.4 billion yen. The items that have large shares are "office machines and automatic data processing equipment" (personal computers, typewriters, projection screens, etc.), and "scientific and controlling instruments and apparatus" (binoculars, thermometers, voltmeters, micrometers, etc.)".
These three categories accounted for about 50% of total procurement value.
The category with the highest ratio of foreign products is "Mineral products" (soil and rocks, crude heavy oil, metal ores, etc.)(about 69 %), and "Aircraft and associated equipment" (aircraft, balloon, propeller, parachute, etc.)( about 62%).
(100 Million Yen, %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 11: Total procurements by types of services(2001)
(Units: 100 million yen, %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 12 shows procurement by product categories and foreign product ratios.
The total number of product procurement amounted to 12,408, and the category of "photographic apparatus and equipment optical goods, and clocks" (film, cameras, projectors, chronometers, etc.), accounted for the largest share of about 23% of the total.
The categories with high foreign shares are "Mineral products" (soil and rocks, crude heavy oil, metal ores, etc.) and " Aircraft and associated equipment".
Table 12: Number of Procurement Contracts by Product Categories(2001)
(Units: number of contracts, %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 13: Number of procurement contracts by type of services(2001)
(Units: number of contracts, %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 14: Implementation of Overall-Greatest-Value Evaluation Method
(Figures in parentheses are percentages) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Responses to pre-bid requests for submission of materials and comments on draft specifications are illustrated in Table 15-1 and Table 15-2.
Table 15-1: Response to Requests for Submission of Materials
(Number of responses) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 15-2: Response to Requests for Comments on Draft Specifications
(Number of responses) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Under the current WTO Agreement on Government Procurement, the period for receiving tenders from the date of publication of the Notice of Invitation to Tender is set at a minimum of 40 days. In addition, a Japanese Government voluntary measure, "Understanding on Government Procurement" issued in November 1991 stipulates that the period should be no less than 50 days.
Table 16 shows that the period of 50 days has been secured.
Table 16: Average period for the receipt of tenders
(days) | ||||||||
|
In order to explain the planned procurement published in the official gazette (kanpo) in details, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and each procurement entity sponsors government procurement seminars at the beginning of, or as early as possible in, the fiscal year. (The Ministry of Foreign Affairs sponsored a seminar on April 26, 2002.)
Table 17: Attendance at Government Procurement Seminars
Classification | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | |
Foreign Ministry Sponsored |
Number of domestic attendants |
69 | 111 | 92 |
Number of foreign attendants |
31 | 33 | 28 | |
Sponsored by other entities |
Number of domestic attendants |
621 | 444 | 516 |
Number of foreign attendants |
82 | 45 | 44 | |
Total | 803 | 633 | 680 |
Table18: Entities with large amount/number of procurement
(%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note; ( ) means percentage in the total.