This survey covers government purchased products and services which fell under the following voluntary measures related to government procurement: "Procedures for Government Procurement on Products (Operational Guidelines)", "Measures on Japanese Public Sector Procurement of Telecommunications Products and Services", and the "Measures Related to Japan's Public Sector Procurement of Medical Technology Products and Services".
In other words, it covers in principle procurement contracts made by central government entities and public corporations given in the following Table A, and products and services of which value were above the threshold given below. *
From 1 January 1995 to 31 March 1996: 100,000 SDR (17 million yen)
From 1 April 1996 to 31 March 1998: 100,000 SDR (14 million yen)
From 1 April 1998 to 31 December 2001: 100,000 SDR (17 million yen)
*(Note1) Procurement for public works (including architectural planning and consultancy ) is excluded from this survey.
Table A
Central Government Entities | Public Corporations | Independent Administrative Institutions |
House of Representatives; House of Councilors; Supreme Court; Board of Audit, Cabinet; National Personnel Authority; Cabinet Office; Imperial Household Agency; National Public Safety Commission; Defense Agency; Financial Services Agency; Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Posts and Telecommunications; Ministry of Justice; Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Ministry of Finance; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare; Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry; Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport; Ministry of the Environment | Water Resources Development Public; Japan Regional Development Corporation; Japan Green Resources Corporation; Japan National Oil Corporation; Japan Railway Construction Public Corporation; New Tokyo International Airport Authority; Japan Highway Public Corporation; Metropolitan Expressway Public Corporation; Hanshin Expressway Public Corporation; Honshu-Shikoku Bridge Authority; Urban Development Corporation; Japan Science and Technology Corporation; Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute; Japan Environment Corporation; Japan International Cooperation Agency; Social Welfare and Medical Service Corporation; Government Pension Investment Fund; Agriculture and Livestock Industries Corporation; Metal Mining Agency of Japan; Japan Small and Medium Enterprise Corporation; Postal Life Insurance Welfare Corporation; Labor Welfare Corporation; Employment and Human Resources Development; Okinawa Development Finance Corporation; National Life Finance Corporation; Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Finance Corporations; Japan Finance Corporation for Small Business; Housing Loan Corporation; Japan Finance Corporation for Municipal Enterprises; Development Bank of Japan; Japan Bank for International Cooperation; Teito Rapid Transit Authority; Japan Tobacco Inc.; Hokkaido Railway Company; East Japan Railway Company; Central Japan Railway Company; West Japan Railway Company; Shikoku Railway Company; Kyusyu Railway Company; Japan Freight Railway Company; Nippon Telegraph and Telephone CO.; Northern Territory Issue Association; Japan Consumer Information Center; Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute; RIKEN(The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research); The Pollution-related Health Damage Compensation and Prevention Association; Fund for the Promotion and Development of the Amami Islands; Japan Foundation; Japan Scholarship Foundation; Japan Arts Council; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; University of the Air Foundation; National Stadium and School Health Center of Japan; Social Insurance Medical Fee Payment Fund; Association for Welfare of the Mentally and Physically Handicapped; Japan Racing Association; Mutual Aid Association of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery Corporation Personnel; National Association of Racing; Farmers' Pension Fund; Japan Keirin Association; Japan External Trade Organization; Japan Motorcycle Racing Organization; New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization; Japan National Tourist Organization; Japan Institute Labor; Mutual Aid Fund for Official Casualties and Retirement of Volunteer Firemen; Corporation for Advanced Transport & Technology; Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private School; Organization for Workers Retirement Allowance Mutual Aid; National Education Center | National Archives of Japan; Communication Research Laboratory; Institute of Fire and Disaster National Research; National Research Institute of Brewing; National Center for University Entrance Examination; National Institute of Special Education; National Olympic Memorial Youth Center; National Women's Education Center; National Youth Houses; National Children's Center; National Institute for Japanese Language; National Science Museum; National Institute for Materials Science; National Research Institute for Earth Sciences and Disaster Prevention; National Aerospace Laboratory of Japan; National Institute of Radiological Sciences; National Museum of Art; National Museum; National Research Institute for Cultural Properties; National Center for Teacher's Development; The National Institute of Health and Nutrition; National Institute of Industrial Safety; National Institute of Industrial Health; Center for Food Quality, Labeling and Consumer services; National Center for Seeds and Seedlings; National Livestock Breeding Center; Fertilizer and Feed Inspection Station; Agricultural Chemicals Inspection Station; National Farmers Academy; Forest Tree Breeding Center; National Salmon Resources Center; National Fisheries University; National Agricultural Research Organization; National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences; National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences; National Institute for Rural Engineering; Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS); Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute; Fisheries Research Agency; Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry; National Center for Industrial Property Information; Nippon Export and Investment Insurance; National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology; National Institute of Technology and Evaluation; Public Works Research Institute; Building Research Institute; National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory; National Maritime Research Institute; Port and Airport Research Institute; Electronic Navigation Research Institute; Civil Engineering Research Institute of Hokkaido; Marine Technical College; National Institute for Sea Training; School for Seafarers Training; Civil Aviation College; The National Institute for Environmental Studies; |
(Note) This table lists up entities that existed in 2001.
The total value for government procurements of goods and services for 2001 was 1.0146 trillion yen, a decrease of 2.7% from the previous year.
Table 1: Total value and number of government procurement contracts
(100mil. Yen or Number of contracts) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The ratios of open tendering contracts to single tendering contracts vary significantly according to whether the items procured were goods or services. In 2001 about 90% of the number of goods procurement was contracted through open tendering procedures. In contrast, in terms of service, more than 40 % of the number of and nearly 70 % of the total value of procurement were contracted through single tendering procedures.
Table 2: Breakdown of procurements by types of goods and services, and by contract type
(Upper col.: Number of contracts, Lower col.: Value(100 mil. Yen)) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In 2001, the open tendering keep occupying a large portion of the total, in terms of numbers of contracts, as well as on value basis. (About 80% on a number of contract base, and about 70% on a value base)
In 2001 the contracts through selective tendering are less than 1% of the total.
Of the reasons listed in the 15th Article of the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement as the conditions of single tendering procedure, the ones most often cited for the adoption of single tendering procedures were that " in the absence of tenders in response to an open or selective tendering," " a change of supplier would harm compatibility with already existing products or equipment," and that " when, for works of art or for reasons connected with protection of exclusive rights such as patents or copyrights, the products can be supplied only by a particular supplier." As in 1999 and 2000, these reasons accounted for more than 90 percent of cases.
Table 5: Reasons for use of single tendering procedures
Reasons | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 |
Number of contract | Number of contract | Number of contract | |
Ratio (%) | Ratio (%) | Ratio (%) | |
In the absence of tenders in response to an open or selective tender | 1,117 | 950 | 476 |
35.7 | 29.7 | 18.5 | |
When, for works or art or for reasons connected with protection of exclusive rights such as patents or copyrights, the products can be supplied only by a particular supplier | 812 | 981 | 772 |
25.9 | 30.7 | 30.1 | |
When, for reasons of extreme urgency, the products could not be obtained in time by means of open or selective tendering procedures | 47 | 59 | 84 |
1.5 | 1.8 | 3.3 | |
The change of supplier would harm interchangeability with already existing products or equipment | 1,048 | 1,131 | 1,159 |
33.5 | 35.3 | 45.1 | |
When an entity procures prototypes or a first product which are developed at its request | 93 | 54 | 67 |
3.0 | 1.7 | 2.6 | |
Others | 16 | 25 | 11 |
0.5 | 0.8 | 0.4 | |
Total | 3,133 | 3,200 | 2,569 |
In comparison to 2000, the ratio of foreign supplier's awards unchanged in the number of contracts in 2001, while it decreased in value basis.
Table6-1: Ratio of Procurement from Foreign Suppliers
(%) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 6-2: Nation's Origin in the Foreign Supplier's Award
Number | Value(100 million yen) | |
USA | 205 | 283.4 |
EU | 121 | 139.3 |
Others | 62 | 27.5 |
Total | 388 | 450.2 |
In 2001, the trend that foreign suppliers' ratio of awards or contracts is higher than that of tenders has continued.
Table7: Ratio of Foreign Suppliers' Tenders and Awards to them in 2001
(%) | |||||||||
|
(Note1)
Ratio of tender: The number of foreign tenders/The total number of tenderers
Ratio of awards: The number of contracts awarded to foreign tenderers/The total number of tenderers in selective tendering procedures
Ratio of contracts: The number of contracts made by foreign suppliers/The number of singletendering procedures
In 2001, foreign goods and services accounted for about 12 % of the total procurement spending, and about 19 % of the total number of contracts.
Table 8: Ratios of Foreign Products and Services
(%) | ||||||||||||
|
[Note1] Figures in parentheses are for products only.
In 2001, products and services from the United States accounted for approximately 60 % on the value basis and about 50% on the number of contracts basis.
Table 9-1: Breakdown of foreign products and services by place of origin (value base)
(100 million yen, number, %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 9-2: Breakdown of Foreign Products and Services by Place of Origin
(number of contract base)
(100 million yen, number, %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 10 shows Japanese government procurement by product categories, which are further broken down into procurement value and ratios for foreign made products.
The total value of procurement of goods amounted to approximately 734.5 billion yen. The items that have large shares are "office machines and automatic data processing equipment" (personal computers, typewriters, projection screens, etc.), "telecommunications and sound recording and reproducing apparatus and equipment"(TV, radio, radar, video, recorder, etc.), and "scientific and controlling instruments and apparatus" (binoculars, thermometers, voltmeters, micrometers, etc.)".
These three categories accounted for about 60% of total procurement value.
The category with the highest ratio of foreign products is "mineral products" (soil and rocks, crude heavy oil, metal ores, etc.), and it accounted for about 64 % in this category.
Table 10: Total procurements by product (2001)
(100 Million Yen, %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 11 shows government procurement by service categories (value basis) and presents the ratio of foreign services.
Total procurement amounted to 277.2 billion yen and 70 % (195.9 billion yen) of total is shared by "Computer and related services," (computer programming, data processing, etc.).
The categories with the highest ratio of foreign services are "Telecommunications services" and "Air transport services".
Table 11: Total procurements by types of services(2001)
(Units: 100 million yen, %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 12 shows procurement by product categories and foreign product ratios.
The total number of product procurement amounted to 11,717, and the category of "photographic apparatus and equipment optical goods, and clocks" (film, cameras, projectors, chronometers, etc.), accounted for the largest share of about 25% of the total.
The categories with high foreign shares are "mineral products" (soil and rocks, crude heavy oil, metal ores, etc.) and " aircraft and associated equipment".
Table 12: Number of Procurement Contracts by Product Categories(2001)
(Units: number of contracts, %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 13 shows government procurement by service categories on contract basis and foreign service ratios.
The number of contracts amounted to 3,131 and about a half of total is "Computer and related services." (computer programming, data processing, etc.)
Table 13: Number of procurement contracts by type of services(2001)
(Units: number of contracts, %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The voluntary measures (Procedures for Government Procurement of Products [Operational Guidelines]) encourage the adoption of the Overall-Greatest-Value evaluation method (OGV) where the lowest-price-award method is deemed inadequate. In addition, in the areas of computer products and services, telecommunications products and services, and medical technology products and services, when large procurement of over 800,000 SDR is conducted, it is obligatory in the voluntary measures to apply the OGV.
In 2001, the OGV was adopted in 745 procurements, representing about 5 % of total procurement. Of these contracts, 187 were awarded to foreign products and services.
Table 14: Implementation of Overall-Greatest-Value Evaluation Method
(Figures in parentheses are percentages) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Responses to pre-bid requests for submission of materials and comments on draft specifications are illustrated in Table 15-1 and Table 15-2.
Table 15-1: Response to Requests for Submission of Materials
(Number of responses) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 15-2: Response to Requests for Comments on Draft Specifications
(Number of responses) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Under the current WTO Agreement on Government Procurement, the period for receiving tenders from the date of publication of the Notice of Invitation to Tender is set at a minimum of 40 days. In addition, a Japanese Government voluntary measure, "Understanding on Government Procurement" issued in November 1991 stipulates that the period should be no less than 50 days.
Table 16 shows that the period of 50 days has been secured.
Table 16: Average period for the receipt of tenders
(days) | ||||||||
|
In order to explain the planned procurement published in the official gazette (kanpo) in details, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and each procurement entity sponsors government procurement seminars at the beginning of, or as early as possible in, the fiscal year. (The Ministry of Foreign Affairs sponsored a seminar on April 26, 2001.)
Table 17: Attendance at Government Procurement Seminars
Classification | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | |
Foreign Ministry Sponsored |
Number of domestic attendants |
104 | 69 | 111 |
Number of foreign attendants |
50 | 31 | 33 | |
Sponsored by other entities |
Number of domestic attendants |
573 | 621 | 444 |
Number of foreign attendants |
59 | 82 | 45 | |
Total | 786 | 803 | 633 |
Table18: Entities with large amount/number of procurement
(%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note; ( ) means percentage in the total.