May 27, 2004
Table of Contents
|
Introduction | |||
1.Introduction | |||
< An overview of the situation in Japan > | |||
By eagerly introducing advanced technology from Europe and the United States and gradually modifying and improving such technology, as well as by effectively utilizing the teamwork of a diligent workforce, Japan successfully established the world's best manufacturing system for the "creation of tangible products." As a result, in the 1980s, Japan attracted attention not only from developing countries but also from Europe and the United States.
However, in the 1990s, which is referred to as the "lost decade," the situation in Japan changed drastically. Due to a complicated mixture of various factors including the prolonged bad debt issue, Japan has remained in an unprecedented, extended economic slump ever since the bubble burst. Although Japan has recently seen a slight economic recovery due to an increase in exports, the employment situation remains severe, and deflation has not yet been overcome. | |||
< Changes in the Environment and Delay in Response > | |||
There are various factors behind the significant decline recently in the international competitiveness of Japanese industry, which had held the top rank in the world until the beginning of the 1990s. One of these factors is that Japan has been content with its old-style industrial system as a result of past successes and has failed to drastically reform the conventional "Japanese model," amid the rapid changes in the environment in recent years.
One example is that, regardless of the changes in the environment including the globalization of economic activity and intensified and accelerated global competition, firms are continuing to operate too many different types of business, instead of concentrating resources on selected domains that could be internationally competitive. Furthermore, the impact of Asian countries on the international competitiveness of Japanese industry cannot be ignored. With technology that has improved rapidly in recent years and the availability of low-cost labor, Asian countries are surpassing Japan in their ability to mass-produce standardized products at lower cost. As a result, Japan's traditional approach to gaining the upper hand in competition by providing cost-competitive products at a designated level of quality has been rendered less effective nowadays. | |||
< Importance of Innovation and Necessity of Reforms in the Knowledge-Based Economy > | |||
In considering the current state of the Japanese economy, it is necessary to focus on another factor related to economic growth; specifically, the significant importance of the role of innovation in the recent economic growth in developed countries. As implied in the term "knowledge-based economy," the value added by knowledge is becoming much more important than ever before in current economic activities. The competition that companies currently experience is not the conventional price competition of similar products or services; rather, competition is becoming more dynamic in that companies are being required to provide innovative products and services differentiated from those of their competitors.
Under these circumstances, it is necessary for companies to continuously create new innovations, and to this end, establishing a system to effectively utilize the outstanding abilities of individuals is important. In this regard, Japan still has much room for improvement. As it is expected that the workforce will decrease as the birthrate declines and that there will be a limit to the vigorous investment activity that has been seen so far, the key to Japan's future economic growth will be an increase in productivity fueled by innovation. Consequently, in order to achieve sustainable economic growth, Japan should quickly carry out drastic reforms to establish a mechanism by which innovations are continuously produced. Fortunately, as Japanese industries and universities retain stocks of knowledge that have supported past economic developments, it is not at all impossible for Japan to generate creative and innovative resources capable of producing the new "knowledge-based economy." Japan is rich in industrious and skilled human resources. Unlike tangible and finite resources such as land and energy, intangible resources such as knowledge and technology will never be exhausted as long as ingenious people continue to exist and create them. Furthermore, Japanese media content including movies, animated cartoons and game software are highly evaluated internationally. Domestically, the broadband-based content business has come to be recognized as a new industry with high potential. In light of this, it is important to promote the creation, protection and exploitation of such content and, in a narrow sense, the technology used to create and distribute it. | |||
< Aiming at Making Japan an Intellectual Property-based Nation > | |||
In order to generate the creation of innovations and original content in the new "knowledge-based economy" and to utilize such resources for economic growth, it is primarily necessary to stimulate and revitalize intellectual creation at universities and other institutions. However, this in itself is not sufficient. Economic revitalization will not be achieved unless the results of such creation are properly protected and effectively utilized as intellectual property.
Based on such awareness, the Strategic Council on Intellectual Property established the Intellectual Property Policy Outline in July 2002, setting the goal of making Japan an "intellectual property-based nation," for the purpose of achieving a dynamic economy and vigorous society through the strategic creation, protection and exploitation of intellectual property. Making Japan an intellectual property-based nation means expressly establishing a national direction which places emphasis on inventions and creation, and in which the production of intangible assets is recognized as the foundation of industry, i.e., the production of "information of value" including technology, design, brands and the content of music, movies, and the like. This is a national policy underpinned by the vision of revitalizing the Japanese economy and society. In the United States, as appellate courts rendered inconsistent judgments in patent lawsuits and their adverse impacts became serious, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) was established in 1982 as a court with exclusive jurisdiction over patent lawsuits. Though the CAFC was established for the principal purpose of rendering consistent judgments, it solidified rights and improved the predictability of judgments, thereby contributing to a pro-patent business approach. For this reason, the establishment of the CAFC is considered to have played a core role in establishing the pro-patent trend in the United States. In 1985, the president's advisory council created the so-called "Young Report" on U.S. competitiveness. Since that time, through the agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) concluded at the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) negotiations as well as through bilateral negotiations, the U.S. Government has taken measures to raise the level of protection of IP in countries where intellectual property has not been sufficiently protected and thereby has indirectly assisted U.S. companies in expanding their businesses overseas. Consequently, there is little dispute that the various reforms undertaken by the U.S., resulting in the shift to the pro-patent policy in the 1980s, contributed to successfully restore and strengthen the international competitiveness of U.S. industry, under the social and economic changes stemming from the full-fledged start of the information age and the knowledge-based economy, and resulted in the achievement of long-term economic growth in the country. In Japan, on the other hand, the Basic Law on Intellectual Property, based on the Intellectual Property Policy Outline, was enacted in November 2002. Under the law, the Intellectual Property Policy Headquarters (hereinafter referred to as the "Policy Headquarters") was established in the Cabinet Secretariat in March 2003. Thus, arrangements were made to design an Intellectual Property Strategic Program (hereinafter referred to as the "Strategic Program"), and Japan took the first step toward becoming an "intellectual property-based nation." Today, 20 years after the United States took its first step, Japan must design a Strategic Program that is not constrained by an existing framework or a traditional mind-set and promote intellectual property strategy; otherwise, it will be too late to revitalize the Japanese economy. However, this does not mean that it will suffice to simply introduce the U.S. system to Japan. As intellectual property systems are international by nature, Japan's IP system should not only be internationally viable but also be founded on an original and firm strategy. Based on such recognition and for the purpose of carrying out drastic reforms, the Policy Headquarters should strongly support the promotion of measures included in the Strategic Program. By making the best use of intellectual property as a source of national wealth, including patents, know-how, and content such as movies and game software, Japan should aim at becoming an "intellectual property-based nation" as soon as possible. This is an urgent task for achieving sustainable growth of the Japanese economy. To this end, it is necessary for various sectors including universities, companies, and the government to review conventional systems and practices thoroughly and work effectively together to establish the world's best IP system. | |||
< Activation of the Intellectual Creation Cycle > | |||
In order to increase national wealth through the effective use of intellectual property, it is necessary to promote the creation of high-quality intellectual property in the R&D sector and the contents businesses and promptly protect such IP legally, thereby maximizing the added value of IP in industry. As this flow is established more firmly, it will become strong and solid, enhancing reproduction of intellectual property. Thus, a virtuous cycle, an intellectual creation cycle, will be established.
It is impossible to make Japan an "intellectual property-based nation" only through the efforts of certain people engaging in intellectual property affairs. Rather, this goal will not be achieved unless everyone is able to enjoy the benefits of intellectual property and is encouraged to participate in the intellectual property cycle in order to create such benefits. In this respect, in order to make Japan a true "intellectual property-based nation," it is necessary to take measures to the maximum extent for the creation, protection and exploitation of intellectual property as well as for the development of human resources that support such activities, from the perspective of ensuring the participation of the entire public in society. Furthermore, it is important to carry out such measures through integrated and organized efforts; otherwise, it will be impossible for the intellectual creation cycle to move speedily and dynamically. | |||
< Society Realized in an Intellectual Property-based Nation > | |||
Becoming an "intellectual property-based nation" means expressly indicating a national direction of placing emphasis on inventions and creation and promoting the creation of "information of value" such as technology, design, brands and the contents of music, movies, etc., thereby revitalizing the Japanese economy and society.
The strong driving force for the devastated Japanese economy in the post-war period was competitiveness in the "production of tangible goods," especially in various manufacturing industries. In the future, the Japanese economy must be based on the "creation of information"; specifically, the creation of original and unrivaled Japanese information. By making the best use of the value added by such information, Japan will be able to also revitalize the field of "production of tangible goods" where Japan is suffering due to the rapidly increasing competitiveness of Asian countries. The "creation of information" will not only serve as a foundation for the "creation of tangible products," which has been supporting Japan until the present time, but also will generate a new business field. Therefore, by making Japan an "intellectual property-based nation," it will also be possible to restore and strengthen the technical capability and competitiveness of the Japanese manufacturing industry while revitalizing the Japanese economy through the creation of new job opportunities. The "creation of information" will not only contribute to increasing material wealth through the strengthening of international competitiveness and by achieving sustainable development of Japanese industry, thereby raising the national income level. The "creation of information" means creating contents such as music, movies and animated cartoons, that is to say, creating Japanese "culture" itself. Thus, in a "nation built on intellectual property," quality and attractive culture will be fostered, and the general public will be able to enjoy such culture; i.e., attain spiritual wealth as well. |
2.Policy for Making Japan an "Intellectual Property-based Nation" |
< Three Viewpoints > |
All of the Japanese intellectual property systems, including the Patent Law and the Copyright Law, have their own histories starting from the Meiji era and have been deeply rooted in the current economy and society of Japan. Many decades have already passed since the existing frameworks were first established (Patent Law, Design Law, and Trademark Law in 1959 and Copyright Law in 1970). On the other hand, the longer these systems have existed, the more necessary it has been to review them constantly with respect to whether they have satisfied the demands of the times. Accordingly, amendments have been repeatedly made until the present time.
However, the current economy and society are changing at an extremely fast rate and on a dynamic scale. At present, Japan has yet to emerge from its long-protracted recession, and is still seeking a clear vision of the future. Now that the goal of aiming to become an "intellectual property-based nation" has been clearly delineated, Japan should actively carry out reforms by anticipating changes in the social and economic situations, rather than only responding to such changes passively, and revitalize the economy as soon as possible. Japan will work to become an "intellectual property-based nation" under the following policies. |
(1) | Developing Special Measures on Intellectual Property that are not Constrained by the Conventional Framework |
For the purpose of strengthening the international competitiveness of Japanese industry and achieving a dynamic society and economy, Japan should establish a mechanism that will promote international harmonization of intellectual property systems while contributing to increasing national wealth in accordance with the direction of such harmonization, beyond the framework of conventional ideas and in a bold and flexible manner. | |
(2) | Establishing the World's Best IP System |
In the current borderless global economy, companies pursuing more attractive market environments have freedom to choose the countries in which they will do business. As more companies place intellectual property strategy at the core of their business planning and management, the countries that have established more favorable intellectual property systems for businesses are able to attract more companies from all over the world and enjoy vigorous business activities in various fields, which results in the further economic development of such countries. Considering that the intellectual property system competition has already started to intensify around the world, Japan should keep up with such developments and establish the world's best IP system. | |
(3) | Carrying out Reforms Rapidly and in a Timely Manner |
"I thought that I was able to view the world without being influenced by daily concerns, but actually, I was too concerned about the present situation of Japan. Today, the world is progressing at a considerable rate," said Mr. Soichiro Honda 50 years ago.
And now, the world is changing at a much more formidable pace. To avoid falling behind in the world, not only Japanese companies but also the Japanese national system should continue to evolve in order to respond to the changes in the global environment in a timely manner. | |
< Implementation > | |
Japan can afford no further delay in becoming an "intellectual property-based nation."
The individual items included in the Strategic Program shall be undertaken by the ministry or agency in charge. Where two or more ministries or agencies are in charge, they should secure close coordination with each other to promote the measures. For these reasons, the individual items in the Strategic Program are assigned to the specific ministries or agencies in charge. The Policy Headquarters shall regularly check the progress of the measures taken by the ministry or agency in charge and encourage them to implement such measures if there is any delay. Furthermore, if there is any delay in the implementation of measures due to the lack of communication between the ministries and agencies in charge, the Policy Headquarters shall comprehensively coordinate the measures. Though not being specifically designated in the Strategic Program, the Policy Headquarters shall be involved in the implementation of all policies. Highly important issues shall be considered by the ministry or agency in charge as well as investigated and discussed by the Policy Headquarters. To this end, task forces shall be established in the Policy Headquarters under the provision of Article 2 of the Cabinet Order on the Intellectual Property Policy Headquarters (Cabinet Order No. 45 issued in February 2003). The goal of making Japan an "intellectual property-based nation" will not be achieved unless the general public shares the understanding of such a goal. Consequently, the Policy Headquarters shall ask for public opinions constantly and also start holding explanatory meetings and symposia on intellectual property strategy at various locations in order to encourage efforts by local governments and business and to have a frank exchange of views with local people throughout Japan. |
3. Points to Be Considered in Making Japan an "Intellectual Property-based Nation" | ||
(1) | Support for SMEs and Venture Companies | |
SMEs play a significant role in supporting the industrial foundation of Japan and developing local economies. Much is expected from venture companies from the perspective of creating new industries. With the aim of achieving diversified and dynamic development in the current severe economic situation where it is impossible to hire additional staff or acquire sufficient operating funds, SMEs and venture companies should become aware of the importance of intellectual property and take measures to protect and exploit it in a strategic manner.
However, it is often the case that SMEs and venture companies, which own and use innovative technologies for their businesses, fail to sufficiently understand the idea of protecting and exploiting such technologies as intellectual property. They do not have sufficient IP management systems compared with large enterprises. The GOJ should take the necessary measures to support SMEs and venture companies with respect to all phases of creation, protection and exploitation of intellectual property as well as human resource development. | ||
(2) | Regional Development | |
The recent trend of decentralization is leading to the development of regional societies that emphasize their own regional characteristics.
Amid such a situation, local governments have started taking full-fledged measures related to intellectual property to achieve innovative technological development through industrial-academic cooperation between universities, related research institutes and R&D-related companies, with universities, which are the center of intellectual creation, serving as the regional core. Furthermore, based on the human networks that are developed in such cooperation, some local governments form regional clusters and launch new businesses that emphasize regional characteristics. The GOJ should continue to promote such efforts so that unique inventions and works will be created throughout Japan, and Japan as a whole will become rich in intellectual property. | ||
(3) | Improvement of Administrative and Judicial Services | |
With the aim of making Japan an "intellectual property-based nation," administrative and judicial authorities should listen sincerely to users' demands and make constant efforts to improve their services.
Until the present time, intellectual property has not been familiar to the general public due to its technical expertise and legal nature. In light of the progress in the development of social networks and for the purpose of actuating the intellectual creation cycle speedily and dynamically, administrative agencies and courts should make positive efforts to provide the public with more information and to improve their services by streamlining the application procedures and reviewing systems for settling disputes on intellectual property, including pioneering inventions. | ||
(4) | Significance of Competition Policy and Attaching Importance to Freedom of Expression | |
Strengthening intellectual property rights is an inevitable requirement of this information age. However, at the same time, strengthening rights may bring with it adverse effects: (i) obstacles to competition and (ii) conflict with the basic values of modern society, such as freedom of expression.
Antitrust laws and other competition laws play a central role in eliminating obstacles to competition, and therefore these laws need reinforcement as appropriate. In the United States, the Antitrust Law is strictly applied to intellectual property monopoly. Such application engenders competition and leads to the development of new industries. Japan too must find a balance and make the appropriate responses. In the case where the protection of intellectual property goes to extremes, it conflicts with the basic values of modern society, such as fair and free competition, academic freedom and freedom of expression. For this reason, in establishing intellectual property systems, we must pay attention to these basic values and strike a balance between these values and the protection of intellectual property rights. Furthermore, we must not forget that universities should not only respond to expectations for the creation and exploitation of intellectual property but also carry out their primary role of providing education. In designing systems for intellectual property at universities, it is necessary to make such systems flexible, based on the diversity of academic and research fields. | ||
4. Progress in Intellectual Property Policy in the Past Year | ||
(1) | Completing the Strategic Program | |
To make Japan an "intellectual property-based nation" in which the international competitiveness of industry is strengthened by focusing on intellectual property, thereby increasing national wealth, the Policy Headquarters developed the Strategic Program on July 8, 2003.
The Strategic Program consists of about 270 items of measures to be implemented by the ministries and agencies concerned in order to promptly create an internationally viable system. It promotes activities based on collaboration by the ministries and agencies concerned at the initiative of the Policy Headquarters. | ||
(2) | Discussions of Task Forces | |
Three task forces-"Task Force on Strengthening of the Foundation for Right Protection," "Task Force on Contents," and "Task Force on the Protection of Patents of Medical-Related Acts"-were established to discuss important issues in intellectual property policy, which had been considered to require further study and discussion in order to complete the Strategic Program. These three task forces started their discussions in the fall of 2003. The Task Force on Strengthening of the Foundation for Right Protection created the "Comprehensive Measures for Accelerating Patent Examination" and "Creation of Intellectual Property High Court" in December 2003, as well as "Strengthening Measures against Counterfeits and Pirated Copies" in May 2004. In addition, the Task Force on Contents prepared the "Contents Business Promotion Policy" in April 2004. The task forces reported their achievements to the Policy Headquarters. Furthermore, the Task Force on the Protection of Patents of Medical-Related Acts is developing discussions on handling medical-related acts under the Patent Law from the viewpoint of promoting the progress of useful and safe medical technology that contributes to improving the level of national health care, while giving due consideration so as not to have an adverse effect on medical acts, etc., to be provided to all residents equally under a relationship of trust between patients and doctors.
In addition, the "Task Force on Intellectual Property Policy" in the Council for Science and Technology Policy discussed the handling of research results at universities, etc., and coordinated the handling of such results in May 2004. | ||
(3) | Achievement Made by the Strategic Program | |
Various measures in the Strategic Program have already resulted in achievements. First of all, taking advantage of their recently acquired independent legal status and corresponding independence in management, national universities have made certain that research results achieved at their institutions are attributed to them and have also been establishing rules and systems to promote industry-academic collaboration, including the establishment of University Intellectual Property Headquarters and the strengthening of cooperation with TLOs. This movement is expected to lead to the appropriate protection and management of intellectual property produced at universities as well as its use in industry.
In addition, regarding patent examination, for which the number of cases on the waiting list is expected to expand to 0.8 million, the GOJ is instituting comprehensive measures to accelerate the patent examination process, including submitting a bill for the "Law for Partial Amendment of the Patent Law, etc." to the Diet and increasing fixed-term examiners by 98 in FY 2004. By continuing to promote these measures strongly, the GOJ aims to eventually eliminate the examination waiting period altogether, and is expected to achieve the world's highest level in prompt and precise patent examination. As for intellectual property-related dispute settlement functions, in order to further enhance and accelerate court procedures for intellectual property-related cases, a bill to establish an Intellectual Property High Court specialized in such cases was submitted to the Diet. Along with it, a bill for the " Law for Partial Amendment of the Court Organization Law" was also submitted to this session of the Diet. The bill included measures such as expanding and clarifying the authorities of judicial research officials, making the proof of infringement easier, protecting trade secrets, and coordinating the relationships between patent infringement litigation and trial for invalidation. Through the establishment of such systems, the Japanese court is expected to achieve fair and prompt intellectual property litigation as a world-leading court. As for strengthening measures against counterfeits and pirated copies, the GOJ amended the Customs Tariff Law and enforced the law in April 2004 in order to disclose to right holders the information on the importers and manufacturers of products suspected of infringing an intellectual property right. This is expected to further increase the accuracy and transparency of infringement-finding procedures and to facilitate the right holder's exercise of rights in a country where infringement has been exposed or in Japan. In addition, there has been certain progress in terms of measures in overseas markets, as, for example, the protection of intellectual property rights was incorporated in the ODA Charter and APEC Summit Declaration/Ministerial Declaration. In regard to the use of intellectual property, a bill to amend the Trust Business Law was submitted to the Diet. If established, the law will diversify the means of managing and using intellectual property owned by companies, etc. and the means of financing with the use of intellectual property, through the use of a mechanism of trust. In addition, the Bankruptcy Law was enacted in May 2004, aiming to protect any company, etc. that has obtained a license for an intellectual property right in the case that a company in the position of the licensor of the relevant intellectual property goes bankrupt. In addition, companies have shown movement toward becoming "intellectual property-based companies" by placing intellectual property at the center of their management strategy. Moreover, in recent years, the IP contents created by Japan have been highly rated overseas, but their attraction is currently not taken full advantage of in business. Therefore, the Task Force on Contents mentioned above compiled the "Contents Business Promotion Policy" relating to the modernization of the IP industry, human resources development, financing, and other matters. In addition, comprehensive activities based on cooperation between the public and private sectors are being promoted, including the establishment of the Entertainment Lawyers Network and the publication of content programs by the University of Tokyo. In order to promote comprehensive content, a bill for the "Law Concerning Promotion of Creation, Protection, and Exploitation of Contents" was submitted to the Diet. In addition, from the viewpoint of establishing the foundation for ensuring that profits are returned to right holders, a bill for the "Law for Partial Amendment of the Copyright Law" was also submitted to the Diet to take measures toward preventing "the phonograms banned to be sold in Japan"from flowing back to Japan and to grant the right to loan out books and magazines. Regarding the development of experts in intellectual property, as the number of legal professionals increases, many attorneys at law voluntarily participate in intellectual property law-related training, revealing an increase in interest in intellectual property among attorneys at law. In addition, regarding patent attorneys, amid the expansion of the number of patent attorneys, patent attorneys acting as counsels in intellectual property infringement lawsuits (limited to cases in which an attorney at law serves as a representative in actual litigation) have been in existence since FY 2003. Moreover, all 68 law schools that were established in April 2004 have been steadily promoting education on intellectual property through the establishment of course subjects on intellectual property laws and other measures. Additionally, the GOJ is considering making intellectual property laws an optional subject for the national bar examination. The above exemplifies the main achievements of the Strategic Program, but in addition to those, the Strategic Program has had many other achievements. Those achievements are listed in the "Progress in Intellectual Property Policy in the Past Year" section at the end of this report. | ||
5.Developing the Intellectual Property Strategic Program 2004 and Future Schedule | ||
The environment surrounding intellectual property of Japan is consistently changing, and thus, the Strategic Program schedule for improving and implementing intellectual property strategy must be reviewed constantly.
From such a viewpoint, the Policy Headquarters recently reviewed the Strategic Program on the basis of the Basic Law on Intellectual Property and established the "Intellectual Property Strategic Program 2004." In the review, the Policy Headquarters made the existing measures even more specific and added measures and incorporated efforts to tackle problems for insufficient progress had been made, while reviewing the overall intellectual property strategy. Consequently, the measures to be implemented reached about 400 items. | ||
< Schedule > | ||
As its immediate targets after the development of the Intellectual Property Strategic Program 2004, the Government of Japan (GOJ) will implement the measures that should be taken by the end of FY 2004 and submit as many intellectual property-related bills as possible to the ordinary session of the Diet to be held in 2005.
Furthermore, the GOJ will follow up on the progress of the Program by the end of FY 2004 and take additional measures as necessary. |
Chapter 1 Creation |
An intellectual creation cycle begins with the creation of intellectual property. The goal of making Japan an "intellectual property-based nation" cannot be achieved without a mechanism for producing creative and innovative R&D assets and for supplying those assets to society. Universities and public research institutes, which own most of the R&D resources in Japan, play an extremely important role in this respect. In order to make Japan an "intellectual property-based nation," it is therefore necessary to establish a mechanism by which universities and public research institutes create outstanding intellectual property, including inventions, software, and databases and for such property to be utilized to the maximum extent in society. It is also necessary to increase the motivation of remarkably talented researchers to create intellectual property. Based on such awareness, the GOJ will take the following measures with the aim of encouraging the creation of high-quality R&D assets at universities and public research institutes, while establishing a society where researchers who create outstanding intellectual property are sufficiently rewarded. |
1. | Development of a Foundation for the Creation of Intellectual Property | |||
(1) | Promoting Education for the Purpose of Encouraging Creativity as well as Education Emphasizing Scientific Technology to Develop World-Class Human Resources with Outstanding Abilities | |||
In FY 2004, in order to foster researchers with abundant creativity, the GOJ will continue to create educational environments and promote educational measures which enhance the unique characters and abilities of individuals while placing emphasis on scientific technology, thereby developing world-class human resources with outstanding abilities. | ||||
(Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) | ||||
(2) | Making Universities More Attractive and Enriching Research Personnel | |||
1) | Revitalizing universities and improving their international competitiveness | |||
i) | On the basis of the status of information disclosure at universities, based on surveys conducted and published in FY 2003, the GOJ will continue to conduct a similar survey in FY 2004, thereby enhancing the disclosure of information on the education provided at universities and their research results. | |||
ii) | Taking into consideration that national universities acquired independent legal status and thereby acquired the right to introduce a more flexible personnel system at their own discretion, the GOJ will continue to evaluate research results including patents in FY 2004 and encourage universities to change their employee promotion systems from seniority-based promotion systems to merit-based systems. | |||
iii) | In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to foster globally competitive universities, being defined as universities that carry out outstanding education and research activities in individual fields. In examining proposals for scientific research grants, the GOJ will take care not to excessively burden universities. | |||
(Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) | ||||
2) | Improving the mobility and diversity of researchers | |||
In order to improve the mobility of researchers for the purpose of realizing the principle of competition as well as to enhance their diversity in order to encourage them to stimulate one another and vitalize their research activities, the GOJ will take the following measures. | ||||
i) | The progress of the Plan for the Improvement of Mobility of Researchers was surveyed and publicized in FY 2003. Based on the "Basic Guidelines for the Improvement of Mobility of Researchers" prepared by the Council for Science and Technology Policy, the GOJ will continue, in FY 2004, to conduct similar surveys as well as publicize the progress of the Plan and take necessary measures to implement the Plan. So as to prevent researchers who change offices from suffering economic disadvantages, the GOJ will also consider actions to improve the relevant systems. | |||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
ii) | Based on the plan entitled "For Training and Ensuring Research Personnel to Improve International Competitiveness" prepared by the Council for Science and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, the GOJ will, in FY 2004, continue to encourage individual universities and public research institutes to clearly design specific actions, based on their independent judgment, for attracting and recruiting researchers from other universities and the private sector, foreign researchers, and female researchers (i.e., improving both the research environment and living environment to attract foreign researchers). | |||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
iii) | For the purpose of encouraging the private sector to employ young researchers such as graduates of doctoral programs and post-doctoral fellows, the GOJ will continue to provide support to improve the business abilities and the practical skills of such researchers in 2004. | |||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
3) | Enabling researchers to devote themselves to research activities | |||
Researchers can cultivate their abilities in the initial stages of their careers and therefore it is important to create an environment where they can devote themselves to research activities during such stages. In order to enhance education at universities and graduate schools and enable young researchers, in particular, to devote themselves to research activities, the GOJ will, in FY 2004, continue to encourage individual universities and public research institutes to increase the number of full-time research assistants based on their independent judgment, on the basis of the plan entitled "For Training and Ensuring Research Personnel to Improve International Competitiveness." | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, and Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) | ||||
(3) | Developing Other Environments for the Creation of Intellectual Property | |||
In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to take the following measures. | ||||
i) | Further promote the improvement of research facilities and equipment based on the "Five-year Plan for Urgent Development of Facilities of National Universities, etc." prepared by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. | |||
ii) | Promote collaboration between local governments and universities/R&D-type independent administrative agencies based on intellectual property strategy developed by local governments. | |||
iii) | Consider environmental development for companies or individuals contributing to universities. | |||
iv) | Promote the distribution of R&D results and research papers by improving the function of universities and academic societies to disseminate information through the establishment of a mechanism to systematically collect research information at universities, such as academic digital content based on the academic content portal system as well as through the development of electronic academic magazines issued by Japan, and to develop a system for promoting the global distribution of research information. | |||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and other ministries and agencies concerned) |
2. | Promoting the Creation of Intellectual Property at Universities and Public Research Institutes | |||
(1) | Promoting R&D Focused on the Creation of Intellectual Property | |||
1) | Promoting R&D focused on the creation of intellectual property at universities and public research institutes | |||
i) | In FY 2004, with the participation of private companies, the GOJ will continue to advance the R&D system, which covers the overall R&D process from basic R&D to the application of research results and technology transfer, and promote R&D activities that are carried out with the intention of obtaining important intellectual property that should be acquired under the national strategy. In doing so, the GOJ will conduct research and evaluation that give due consideration to the creation, protection and exploitation of intellectual property. | |||
ii) | In FY 2004 and beyond, the GOJ will focus on the expansion of competitive research grants, with the aim of doubling them, under the "Second Science and Technology Basic Plan." | |||
iii) | In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to promote the development and practical application of advanced technology equipment with competitive research grants. In addition, the GOJ will also encourage the utilization of the most advanced large facilities and equipment so that Japanese researchers can conduct world class research activities. | |||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
2) | Utilizing patent information in R&D | |||
i) | Based on the consideration of specifications for a comprehensive system for searching bibliographical information (including research papers) and patent information, the GOJ will start developing a system in FY 2004, with the aim of launching the system in FY 2005. | |||
ii) | Patent information search helps researchers to avoid overlapping research and Intellectual Property right infringement. Therefore, by the end of FY 2004, the GOJ will inform researchers at universities and public research institutes of the importance of patent information searches, and encourage them to search relevant patent information when conducting an investigation of potential research themes or evaluating research results. The GOJ will also promote risk management at universities and public research institutes. | |||
iii) | In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to make efforts to improve the functions of the Industrial Property Digital Library (IPDL) and expand the amount of available information. The GOJ will also develop an environment where researchers at universities and public research institutes can easily access high-quality patent information by providing active support for the wide use of the IPDL at universities and public research institutes, including discussion about a dedicated line connecting the IPDL and the national universities. | |||
iv) | In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to enhance training programs concerning methods for searching and utilizing patent information, including the dispatch of experts in patent information searches. | |||
v) | In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to use patent information in selecting research targets with respect to R&D sponsored by the national government. | |||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
3) | Assigning personnel in charge of intellectual property at R&D sites | |||
In FY 2004, in the fields where the creation of technology-related intellectual property is expected, the GOJ will continue to encourage universities and public research institutes to assign an industry-academic-government collaboration coordinator in charge of intellectual property to each appropriate R&D site in universities and public research institutes and encourage such institutions to provide the collaboration coordinator with training on intellectual property. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
(2) | Exploiting Intellectual Property in R&D Evaluation | |||
1) | Utilizing comprehensive evaluation indicators regarding intellectual property | |||
In FY 2004 and beyond, the GOJ will utilize "comprehensive evaluation indicators" as indicators regarding intellectual property that are to be used in R&D evaluation and in the distribution of R&D funds and other R&D resources, while referring to the number of patents obtained (or patent applications filed). These comprehensive evaluation indicators focus on quantitative aspects such as the number of license contracts, the amount of income from such contracts, and the frequency of patents and research papers being cited in other patent application documents, as well as achievements in joint research and business startups, and the number of consultations. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
2) | Manifesting that making social contribution is included in the researcher's duties and attaching importance to intellectual property in performance evaluation | |||
i) | Taking into account that "disseminating research results at national universities and promoting the utilization thereof" was clearly positioned as one of the operations of national universities, in FY 2004 and beyond, importance will be attached to intellectual property such as research papers when evaluating the performance of researchers in fields where the creation of intellectual property is expected. "Comprehensive evaluation indicators" will be utilized in such evaluations. | |||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
ii) | In FY 2004 and beyond, the GOJ will encourage universities to establish appropriate evaluation systems, while giving due consideration to transparency and fairness to the greatest possible extent, and diffuse such systems throughout universities. In establishing evaluation systems, it is important to make reference to personnel systems utilized by companies as well as to evaluation systems operated by other universities and research institutes in Japan and abroad. In light of this, the GOJ will provide universities with necessary information by publishing specific examples. | |||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
3) | Considering intellectual property-related activities in evaluating universities and R&D-type independent administrative agencies | |||
In 2004 and beyond, the National Institution for Academic Degrees and University Evaluation and the National University Evaluation Committee will evaluate universities in consideration of their characteristics and on the basis of the efforts of individual universities to create, protect and exploit intellectual property and will publish the evaluation results. In the evaluation of R&D-type independent administrative agencies, "comprehensive evaluation indicators" regarding the creation, protection and exploitation of intellectual property will also be applied as indicators for ex post evaluation. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
4) | Adding to the items in the applications for research funds by public subscription and the items for ex post facto assessment | |||
The GOJ will require applicants for scientific research subsidies and research funds by public subscription to state their intellectual property activities on application forms so that the GOJ can use such information as reference in evaluation and in selecting research targets in FY 2004 and beyond. The GOJ will also require applicants to present the status of their intellectual property activities in performance reports. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
(3) | Providing Various Incentives to Researchers | |||
1) | Clarifying the rules for returning royalties to individual researchers | |||
In FY 2004 and beyond, the GOJ will promptly encourage universities and public research institutes to clarify the payment rules for returning royalties to individual researchers, who have obtained relevant research results in cases where universities and public research institutes are assigned the rights for research results created by the researchers and receive the royalties corresponding to such rights, and to clarify the payment rules for universities' returning royalties to the faculties and departments to which relevant researchers belong. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
2) | Reflecting university efforts to create intellectual property in the allocation of GOJ funding for research | |||
In FY 2004 and beyond, as part of the measures to encourage the creation of intellectual property, the GOJ will establish a mechanism to reflect university IP-related efforts in resource allocations. In this case, "comprehensive evaluation indicators" will be utilized. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
(4) | Enhancing Funds for Intellectual Property-Related Activities Including Obtaining and Managing Intellectual Property Rights | |||
i) | In FY 2004 and beyond, the GOJ will enhance financial support for national, public and private universities and TLOs for patent-related expenses, including the costs for filing foreign patent applications and the additional administrative and maintenance costs, under the principle of competition, while respecting their independent judgments. The GOJ will also encourage individual universities to independently secure necessary patent-related expenses. | |||
ii) | As soon as possible in FY 2004, the GOJ will clarify and inform universities of the details regarding competitive research grants, as a portion of the indirect expenses can be appropriated to patent-related expenses and in order to encourage the active use of such a research grant system, and will also expand the system. Furthermore, the GOJ will encourage the flexible handling of patent-related expenses while taking into consideration the time lag between when R&D is actually carried out and when patent-related expenses are incurred. | |||
In addition, the GOJ will take similar measures with respect to indirect expenses in government research funds other than competitive research grants. | ||||
iii) | The GOJ has just taken a measure that gives due consideration so as not to reduce incentives for intellectual property-related activities, including handling income from patents separately when assessing subsidies for IP management for universities and public research institutes. The GOJ will actively promulgate the measure. | |||
iv) | In FY 2004 and beyond, with respect to joint research projects in which universities and public research institutes are proactively engaged, the GOJ will secure sufficient funds to strategically obtain and maintain intellectual property for the purpose of commercializing the research results. To this end, the GOJ will encourage universities and public research institutes to secure, in advance, the cost of obtaining and maintaining intellectual property from research funds provided by sponsoring companies. In doing so, the GOJ will promote the flexible handling that enables universities and public research institutes to carry over such research funds or use them for other research results. | |||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
(5) | Establishing Comprehensive Systems for Intellectual Property such as University Intellectual Property Headquarters and Technology Licensing Organizations (TLOs) | |||
1) | Establishing University Intellectual Property Headquarters | |||
i) | Establishing characteristic Intellectual Property Headquarters for universities | |||
In response to the establishment of University Intellectual Property Headquarters in many universities, in FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to enhance and strengthen the functions of University Intellectual Property Headquarters, based on the creative efforts of individual universities, and provide support for individual universities to ensure that various types of intellectual property management systems are established according to the circumstances of the individual universities. | ||||
ii) | Establishing management and utilization systems for patents, etc. under consolidated management | |||
By the end of FY 2004, the GOJ will encourage individual universities and public research institutes to clarify their own intellectual property policy under consolidated management and to establish, as soon as possible, a system (framework, procedure, etc.) to promptly and precisely determine the most appropriate method to protect and utilize patents, etc. or to publish research papers, depending on the contents of individual research results. Also, the GOJ will encourage universities and public research institutes to establish a system so that patent applications can be promptly filed without excessive burden on researchers if it is determined that the researchers should file the patent applications. | ||||
iii) | Establishing Super Industry-Academic-Government Collaboration Headquarters that have international competitiveness | |||
As soon as possible in FY 2004 and beyond, the GOJ will evaluate intellectual property-related activities carried out by University Intellectual Property Headquarters, strictly select headquarters that carry out vigorous activities and which are expected to strengthen the international competitiveness of Japanese industry, designate a Super Industry-Academic-Government Collaboration Headquarters, and reinforce support for such headquarters. | ||||
iv) | Disseminating information on human resources | |||
The Japan Patent Attorneys Association has collected and organized information on patent attorneys to develop a database and is introducing appropriate human resources in response to the requests of universities. In FY 2004, the GOJ, with the cooperation of patent attorneys, attorneys at law and relevant industrial organizations, will disseminate information on excellent human resources who are able to participate in activities of University Intellectual Property Headquarters (such as (i) private-sector employees who have abundant knowledge and experience on intellectual property and (ii) patent attorneys and attorneys at law who have advanced practical abilities), thereby introducing and providing appropriate human resources in response to the requests of universities and public research institutes. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
2) | Developing TLOs | |||
i) | Promoting the development of TLOs | |||
In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to provide newly established TLOs with financial support for a certain period and assistance in filing foreign patent applications. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
ii) | Developing Super TLOs that specialize in specific technical strategic fields | |||
By the end of FY 2004, the GOJ will evaluate the activities of existing TLOs to strictly select Super TLOs that have excellent technology licensing performance in technical fields with high actual demand. By providing such Super TLOs with support for developing and securing experts, the GOJ will radically reinforce the Japanese technology licensing system. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) | ||||
iii) | So as to allow TLOs to start management trust businesses of intellectual property rights including the right to obtain a patent without any restrictions in principle, a bill to amend the Trust Business Law was submitted to the ordinary session of the Diet in 2004. If the bill becomes law, the GOJ will inform TLOs of the new law and encourage them to actively utilize it. | |||
(Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) | ||||
3) | Establishing the guidelines for handling intellectual property and providing one-stop services | |||
Based on the fact that many universities have established University Intellectual Property Headquarters and intellectual property policy, in FY 2004 and beyond, the GOJ will promote the utilization of the consultation services available at the ministries and agencies in order to support the above activities by universities and enable universities to file patent applications and transfer patented technologies in a timely manner. | ||||
(Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) | ||||
4) | Clearly indicating the sections in charge of university-industry collaboration | |||
Based on the development of University Intellectual Property Headquarters at many universities and public research institutes, in FY 2004, universities and public research institutes will continue to take measures to clearly indicate the sections in charge of university-industry collaboration, which are to receive offers for the utilization of intellectual property and joint research projects from industry, by integrating the offices for industry-academic-government collaboration and intellectual property management. | ||||
(Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
5) | Establishing comprehensive systems for intellectual property at universities and strengthening the functions of such systems | |||
i) | Based on the establishment of University Intellectual Property Headquarters at many universities, in FY 2004, the GOJ will encourage individual universities to establish comprehensive systems for promoting the creation, protection and exploitation of intellectual property through collaboration between University Intellectual Property Headquarters and TLOs and to drastically strengthen university activities related to intellectual property, such as disseminating and raising awareness of intellectual property, providing various guidelines and rules, coordinating joint research and contract research, obtaining intellectual property rights, carrying out technology transfer, transferring rights for digital content, dealing with legal affairs, supporting business startups, serving as incubator, and additionally, expediting the relevant procedures. | |||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
ii) | In FY 2004, the GOJ will promote the establishment of a comprehensive system based on collaboration between University Intellectual Property Headquarters and TLOs focusing on the following points, while referring to several models of ideal organic linkage of the organizations for industry-academic-government collaboration, such as IP sections within universities and TLOs. | |||
・In order to avoid the situation in which inventions created at universities are left unused and remain as non-performing assets, the GOJ will encourage universities to establish a system for sufficiently utilizing the knowledge and experience stored in TLOs, while utilizing appropriate human resources including individuals in the private sector and lawyers/patent attorneys, and the aforementioned system will be employed when University Intellectual Property Headquarters evaluate research results and consider the possibility of obtaining rights and marketing. | ||||
・As for investments made by universities in TLOs and personnel exchange, such as serving concurrently as Director, for the strengthening of collaboration with TLOs, the GOJ will inform universities and TLOs of the significance and advantage of collaboration and cooperation between them. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
6) | Evaluating University Intellectual Property Headquarters and TLOs | |||
In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to follow up activities carried out by University Intellectual Property Headquarters and TLOs annually. In FY 2004 and beyond, the GOJ will establish appropriate evaluation methods, evaluate University Intellectual Property Headquarters and TLOs by such methods, and publish evaluation criteria and evaluation results in order to utilize them for resource allocation. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) | ||||
7) | Promoting cooperation and networking | |||
i) | In order to strengthen and improve the "Japan Association for University Intellectual Property and Technology Management," which is a nationwide collaborative organization established in 2003, in order to prevent a vicious circle in which universities and TLOs have difficulty in achieving economic independence as they file patent applications and obtain patents without any prospect for licensing, the GOJ will, in FY 2004, continue to ensure that universities and TLOs cooperate with one another in (i) investigating "good practices" of industry-academic-government collaboration and technology licensing, (ii) promoting the exchange and sharing of information and the establishment of information networks, (iii) coordinating opinions, and (iv) promoting human resource development by utilizing case studies. | |||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) | ||||
ii) | In FY 2004, in order to ensure that TLOs in Japan cooperate with one another to effectively exploit intellectual property created at universities by licensing such property to the appropriate companies and that University Intellectual Property Headquarters and TLOs also deal effectively with technology transfers from such universities and public research institutes (including local institutes) that have not yet established relationships with TLOs, the GOJ will continue to support dramatic improvement of such business cooperation, enhance industry-academic-government collaborative organizations and technical licensing organizations, and promote the strengthening of collaboration and networking between the relevant institutions nationwide. The GOJ will also promote measures to deal with the transfer of rights for digital content. | |||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
iii) | In FY 2004, in order to strengthen and improve the nationwide collaborative organizations of University Intellectual Property Headquarters and TLOs, the GOJ will continue to promote collaboration with technical licensing organizations. overseas in addition to activities mentioned in i) and ii). | |||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
8) | Encouraging students to participate in intellectual property-related activities at universities | |||
In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to encourage students to participate in intellectual property-related activities at universities, in addition to personnel in charge of such activities at companies and universities. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) | ||||
9) | Encouraging universities to disclose information on intellectual property-related activities | |||
By the end of FY 2004, the GOJ will encourage universities to regularly disclose information on their intellectual property-related activities, including intellectual property rights in their possession, achievements such as the number of licenses and of patent applications filed, recruitment of personnel from the private sector at Intellectual Property Headquarters, and intellectual property policy. | ||||
(Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) | ||||
(6) | Clarifying the Rules on Intellectual Property | |||
1) | Setting the principle of consolidated management by individual organizations while giving due consideration to the mobility of researchers | |||
i) | Many universities and public research institutes have recently established a system of consolidated management by individual organizations in respect to the attribution of inventions, etc. For universities and public research institutes where such a system has not yet been established, the GOJ will encourage these organizations to ensure that inventions, etc. are attributed to the organizations in principle and to establish a system of consolidated management by individual organizations as soon as possible in FY 2004 so that they can use intellectual property efficiently. In addition, regarding the items to be defined and transferred as inventions, such as materials used in research and other activities (microorganisms, biological resources such as laboratory animals and plants, and samples of chemical compounds and materials), software, databases, and digital contents, the GOJ will encourage universities and public research institutes to clarify rules for handling such materials so as to make the inventions created at universities and public research institutes the property of the organizations in principle. | |||
With respect to the copyrights for software, digital content, etc., the GOJ will encourage universities and public research institutes to clarify the rules for handling such creations in light of the idea of an employee's work and to make clear whether or not copyrights are open to society free of charge. | ||||
ii) | Many universities and public research institutes have just established a provision to the effect that researchers shall report research results to organizations to which they belong (University Intellectual Property Headquarters, etc.) if any patentable results are obtained. For universities and public research institutes which have not yet established such a provision, the GOJ will encourage them to establish such a provision as early as FY 2004. In addition, although inventions created by graduate students and undergraduate students are generally considered to be the property of those graduate students and undergraduate students, it is desirable that such students report to universities the inventions which have been created by them using university facilities or the inventions that are considered to be joint inventions of professors and themselves due to the strong connection between education and research by a supervisory professor. After the establishment of such a provision, the GOJ will encourage universities and public research institutes to develop rules to ensure that the rights over inventions for which they have no intention to file patent applications will be returned to the researchers who created the inventions. | |||
iii) | As early as possible in FY 2004, the GOJ will encourage universities and public research institutes to clarify rules between the organization and researchers in order to enable researchers to continue their research and receive appropriate returns even if they have changed the organizations to which they belong. | |||
As for handling inventions and other research results created by researchers who belong to universities or public research institutes that continue to own the IP created by its researchers even if the researchers have changed their organizations, it is desirable that such inventions shall be handled in accordance with the regulations of the organization to which the researchers belonged at the time of creation of the relevant inventions. | ||||
In this regard, the GOJ will encourage universities and public research institutes to take flexible measures while extensively considering contract points and other possible means, in order to ensure that researchers' inventions, as the rights for the inventions belong to the universities or public research institutes for which the researchers were previously employed, work against researchers' continuing research at the universities or public research institutes to which they transferred or against industry-academic collaborative projects. | ||||
Moreover, in case researchers participate in a research project, to which universities or public research institutes allocate special budgets, or in an industry-academic collaborative research project, it is important for organizations to which such researchers transferred to take flexible measures, such as confirming research results (including results regarding the method of research) of relevant researchers before their transfer and obtaining confirmation from organizations to which relevant researchers previously belonged with respect to confidentiality and applications filed in a certain period after the transfer of the researchers. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
2) | Supporting the development of rules for industry-academic-government collaboration and securing flexibility in concluding contracts | |||
i) | In order for universities and public research institutes to promote their own strategies for the exploitation of intellectual property and the implementation of joint research and contract research, in FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to encourage such institutions to clarify policies and rules for implementing and handling joint research and contract research with private companies as well as to develop and disclose their own contract formats and operation manuals. These policies and rules include: | |||
・Rules for handling trade secrets and other confidential information | ||||
・Rules concerning the attribution of intellectual property rights that are the results of joint research | ||||
・Policies for the assignment and licensing of rights to private companies | ||||
・Rules for handling rights in cases where intellectual property is created in cooperation with researchers of other domestic or foreign universities | ||||
Furthermore, the GOJ will provide necessary information regarding industry-academic-government joint research agreements, including various guidelines and specific examples with respect to contract points pertaining to the implementation and the handling of joint research and contract research with private companies, and regarding universities which will not commercialize inventions and private companies which promote putting research to practical use in business. | ||||
By the end of FY 2004, the GOJ will encourage individual universities to implement appropriate security measures for the handling of trade secrets based on the guidelines that were prepared for university officials and professors as well as graduate students and undergraduate students in consideration of the characteristics of universities. Moreover, the GOJ will encourage universities to publicly inform others of the fact that the rules for handling the attribution of intellectual property rights within universities differ between professors/officials and graduate students/undergraduate students. | ||||
ii) | By the end of FY 2004, the GOJ will make available for public reference, model cases organized in FY 2003 regarding the conflict of interests that researchers will experience in the course of promoting industry-academic-government collaboration, and thereby encourage universities and public research institutes to establish a policy for dealing with such conflict of interests. In order to enable researchers to deal with the conflict of interests in light of the various forms of industry-academic-government collaboration and the characteristics of research fields, the GOJ will also prepare and disclose to the public reference cases with sufficient attention to the problems that conflict of interests may cause not only for individual researchers but also for organizations. | |||
iii) | In FY 2004, in light of the establishment of University Intellectual Property Headquarters at many universities, the GOJ will continue to secure flexibility in concluding contracts, so that universities and public research institutes will be able to conclude contracts on joint or contract research based on discussions between companies and universities about the handling of intellectual property rights and other matters. | |||
iv) | By the end of FY 2004, the GOJ will encourage industry to increase its understanding of the position of universities and public research institutes, such as the fact that they do not always make research results available to the private sector for utilization in business, and to be flexible in concluding contracts. | |||
v) | By the end of FY 2004, in order to increase both parties' understanding of the specific way to promote industry-academic collaboration and establish a better environment, the GOJ will encourage both parties to further enrich conversations between themselves. | |||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
(7) | Promoting University Start-ups | |||
i) | Based on the fact that University Intellectual Property Headquarters were developed at many universities and intellectual property policy was established at individual universities, by the end of FY 2004, the GOJ will encourage universities and public research institutes to adopt flexible handling that enables rights to be transferred or licenses to be granted at the request of researchers who intend to start businesses, while giving due consideration to conflicts of interest, in order to promote business startups using inventions created at universities and institutes. | |||
ii) | For the purpose of steadily promoting the corporatization and commercialization of research results made at universities and institutes, in FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to improve and strengthen support for the creation and business development of university start-ups and provide support for university start-ups and other companies in carrying out empirical testing and practical application research through the matching of industries and universities. Furthermore, the GOJ will promote the transfer of research results made at universities by trusting companies with the development of such research results that are made at universities but are difficult to corporatize. In addition, considering that university start-ups have difficulty in securing human resources with the necessary management knowledge, the GOJ will dispatch specialists such as lawyers and certified accountants to them, and will also improve the support environment by creating a network of supporters of university start-ups. | |||
iii) | By the end of FY 2004, in order to widely disseminate excellent research results made at universities and public research institutes and return them to society smoothly, the GOJ will arrange opportunities for persons concerned at universities and public research institutes and those in industries to gather at one place and aim at a nationwide matching of industries and universities. | |||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
(8) | Allowing National Universities to Acquire Stocks as Compensation for Licensing | |||
By the end of FY 2004, in order to promote the transfer of technology possessed by national universities, the GOJ will allow national universities to acquire stocks as compensation for licensing. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, and Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) | ||||
(9) | The Balance between Smooth Research Activities and Protection of Intellectual Property | |||
1) | Realizing the balance between free exchange of opinions among researchers and patent protection | |||
With the aim of solving the problem of inventions lacking novelty due to a free exchange of opinions among researchers, in FY 2004, universities and public research institutes will continue to promulgate to R&D sites that inventions will never lack novelty due to the exchange of opinions under conditions of confidentiality, by making full use of explanatory material, which was distributed to R&D sites in FY 2003, regarding unpatentable inventions which were publicly known. . | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
2) | Ensuring the smooth use of patented inventions in research | |||
i) | Organizing and disseminating ideas about experimentation and research | |||
By the end of FY 2004, the GOJ will inform R&D sites of ideas about experimentation and research to which patent rights do not extend and measures to ensure the smooth use of patented inventions in cases of experimentation and research to which patent rights do extend, such as the use of licensing for research purposes, guidelines for encouraging such licensing, and the preparation of model contracts. In doing so, the GOJ will give sufficient consideration so as not to prevent universities and public research institutes from conducting research freely. | ||||
ii) | Formulating and publicizing contract guidelines for patented inventions financed by the national treasury | |||
By the end of 2004, the GOJ will promptly formulate and publicize guidelines for concluding contracts between the state and universities/public research institutes concerning the results of research obtained at universities and public research institutes, which was financed by the national treasury. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
3) | Ensuring the smooth use of research materials | |||
i) | In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to make efforts to further promulgate among universities and public research institutes the conditions regarding the transfer of research materials and the rules for simple transfer procedures in order to ensure the smooth use of tangible materials in research activities. | |||
ii) | In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to clarify the ownership of intellectual property, including know-how that is transformed into tangible materials at universities and public research institutes, as well as the necessary management of such materials, while referring to the "Guidelines for the Management of Trade Secrets." | |||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) |
3. | Promoting the Creation of High-Quality Intellectual Property | |||
By establishing a fundamental system for sufficiently rewarding researchers who create basic inventions, the GOJ will motivate researchers and provide them with greater incentive to create high-quality intellectual property. The GOJ will also encourage universities, public research institutes and companies to shift the emphasis in their patent strategy from quantity to quality and motivate them to obtain basic patents. | ||||
(1) | Preparing a Collection of Reference Examples Regarding Procedure for Deciding a Reasonable Remuneration for an Employee's Invention | |||
For an employee's invention, a bill to expedite patent examination, including an amendment of the provision regarding employees' inventions under the Patent Law, was submitted to the ordinary session of the Diet in FY 2004. If the bill is enacted, the GOJ will promptly prepare a collection of examples that is helpful to set up procedures for deciding reasonable remuneration between individual companies and inventors. | ||||
If the bill is enacted, the GOJ will constantly monitor its implementation status and changes in the rise of employment mobility after its enactment, and will conduct, if necessary, deliberations based on the verification of a desirable system. | ||||
(Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) | ||||
(2) | Reviewing the Exceptions to the Lack of Novelty of Invention | |||
With respect to the exceptions to the lack of novelty of invention that are designed to prevent inventions from lacking novelty due to disclosure in presentation, publication, or meetings, the GOJ will examine the extension of the grace period for the exceptions and promptly consider relaxing or abolishing the requirement of inventions being made public in a written form at a workshop held by an academic society designated by the Commissioner of the Japan Patent Office to widely recognize inventions made public at workshops before the corresponding patent applications have been filed as exceptions to the lack of novelty of invention, while taking into account the trend in discussions on the international harmonization of patent systems. The GOJ will draw a conclusion by the end of FY 2004. | ||||
Until the conclusion of the review is drawn, the GOJ will examine measures to prevent the novelty of invention from lacking due to a presentation of papers (master's thesis, doctoral thesis, etc.), including interests and losses concerning such measures within present law. | ||||
In addition, the GOJ will inform researchers and other persons concerned that this provision is merely an exception and also inform universities that they have to contrive ways to promote the results of research at their institutions, such as hosting presentations of research results and securing an agreement of confidentiality from those individuals attending the presentation . | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) | ||||
(3) | Promoting the Objectives and Contents of the Internal Priority System | |||
At universities and public research institutes, basic and fundamental inventions are often created, and they are likely to develop into inventions of improvement based on additional tests and secondary research activities. In order to ensure that the internal priority system that is effective in protecting all of these inventions without exception is understood and utilized, the GOJ will continue to promote the objectives and contents of the system in FY 2004. | ||||
(Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) | ||||
(4) | Encouraging the Use of Laboratory Notebooks | |||
i) | Universities and public research institutes are steadily promoting laboratory notebooks. In order to encourage the positive use of laboratory notebooks that contribute to the clear identification of inventors as well as to the clear proof of results of joint research, in FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to organize and publish important points regarding the significance of laboratory notebooks and how to use and manage such notebooks. | |||
ii) | In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to encourage universities and public research institutes to promote the use of laboratory notebooks by providing training and education programs regarding how to use and manage such notebooks. | |||
iii) | In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to encourage companies to introduce laboratory notebooks by issuing laboratory notebooks in the training programs for companies and raising the awareness of such notebooks. | |||
iv) | In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to consider the possibility of utilizing electronic media as a substitute for laboratory notebooks and consider the problems that would arise from such utilization. | |||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
(5) | Awarding Remarkable Activities Performed in Industry-Academic-Government Collaboration | |||
In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to select successful cases from industry-academic-government collaboration activities and provide opportunities to publicize the details or factors of success. The GOJ will also enhance the systems for rewarding individuals, groups and organizations achieving remarkable results. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Posts and Telecommunication, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) | ||||
(6) | Enforcing the Japanese Bayh-Dole System | |||
1) | Ensuring the enforcement of the Japanese Bayh-Dole system | |||
Although Article 30 of the Law on Special Measures for Industrial Revitalization (referred to as the "Japanese Bayh-Dole system"), which provides that intellectual property rights obtained in R&D projects sponsored by the national government or special public corporations belong to those that actually carried out the R&D projects under contract, is applied to about 90% of all cases, the GOJ will continue to ensure the complete enforcement of the system in FY 2004. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
2) | Expanding the utilization of the Japanese Bayh-Dole system | |||
Regarding the attribution of intellectual property not only at universities and public research institutions but also in industry, a bill was submitted to ensure that intellectual property rights for products that are created in content development projects for government use (content within the scope of culture or entertainment) belong to the persons who actually carried out the projects under contract. Taking this into consideration, in FY 2004 and beyond, the GOJ will ensure that intellectual property rights also belong to the persons who actually carried out projects under contract regarding software development projects for government use, and will submit related bills to the Diet. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
(7) | Reforming Awareness in Industry | |||
i) | Strengthening the ability to discern in business executives | |||
In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to encourage business executives to improve their ability to exploit intellectual property by strengthening their ability to appreciate the value of research results achieved at universities and public research institutes, or in other words, their discerning ability. Furthermore, in order for business executives and personnel in charge of intellectual property affairs to properly understand the intellectual property-related activities that are carried out at universities and strategically protect and exploit the intellectual property of research results, the GOJ will take measures to increase awareness of intellectual property, such as holding seminars and symposiums regarding intellectual property strategy for business executives and personnel in charge of intellectual property affairs and exchanging opinions between companies and the ministries and agencies concerned. | ||||
ii) | Clearly assigning contact sections | |||
In light of "the Recommendations for the Establishment of Industry-Academic-Government Collaboration" prepared by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, in FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to encourage industry to clearly assign contact sections for industry-academic-government collaboration in individual companies for the purpose of ensuring smooth and efficient negotiations between universities/research institutes and companies. | ||||
iii) | Encouraging companies to position industry-academic-government collaboration in R&D strategy | |||
By the end of FY 2004, the GOJ will encourage industry to actively position itself to collaborate with universities and public research institutes in corporate management strategy and to willingly disclose activities based on industry-academic-government collaboration and the performance of such activities. | ||||
(Council for Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and other ministries and agencies concerned) | ||||
(8) | Promoting the Creation of Attractive Designs | |||
i) | In order to create an environment in which the strategic creation of designs will be promoted and to increase the understanding of and interest in excellent designs among the general public, the GOJ established "Design Month" and Design and Business Forum in FY 2003. In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to hold seminars, symposiums and other events as part of those projects. | |||
ii) | In order to support the development of human resources who will create attractive designs, in FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to improve educational content provided by technical schools and other schools, develop curriculum and teaching materials necessary for the development of design management personnel, and conduct educational experiments. | |||
iii) | In order to disclose and provide design-related information possessed by the JPO, the GOJ will prepare organized and standardized data by the end of FY 2004. | |||
iv) | In order to develop useful design information and make it broadly available for the purpose of encouraging the creation of attractive designs, in FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to develop basic information concerning human property, including the measurement of the human body. | |||
(Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) | ||||
Chapter 2 protection | |||
I . Strengthening the Protection of Intellectual Property |
In order to secure incentives for the creation of intellectual property and to utilize intellectual property effectively, its proper protection is indispensable, and the related systems and frameworks must be further developed. Therefore, the Government of Japan (GOJ) will strive to establish the foundation for the sufficient protection of intellectual property by appropriately protecting any new intellectual property, while monitoring the trend in the global harmonization of IP-related systems and in the progress made in technological innovation, as well as by developing frameworks for improving and expediting right obtainment procedures and legal procedures. |
1. Expeditious Examination of patent applications |
Amidst economic globalization and intensive international competition, the request for the early establishment of rights has been increasing more than ever before. The early establishment of rights extends the contribution of R&D investment to profits through the elimination of overlapping researches and the revitalization of competition in domestic technical development, thereby contributing to the increasing global competitiveness of Japanese companies. In addition, the early obtainment of rights for inventions enables the leaders who actively work on R&D to maintain their superiority with creative, high value-added products, and it also contributes to strengthening competitiveness of SME/venture companies that have innovative technology.
On the other hand, looking at the actual status of patent examination, the number of applications waiting to be examined has been increasing year by year. The number now totals approximately 520,000, and the waiting period for patent examination reached 26 months (at the end of 2003). Unless appropriate measures are taken, the number of applications waiting to be examined is expected to increase up to approximately 800,000 because of the change of the examination request period. Therefore, the GOJ will implement comprehensive measures to clear away applications waiting to be examined, aiming to achieve the end goal of completely eliminating the waiting period for patent examination. |
(1) | Achieving Expeditious and Accurate Patent Examination at the Highest Global Standard | |||
As for expediting a patent examination, the proposed Law for the Promotion of Expeditious Patent Examination was submitted to the ordinary session of the Diet in 2004. If the bill is enacted, the GOJ will take the following measures to promote expediting patent examinations. | ||||
i) | In order to steadily achieve an expeditious patent examination, the GOJ will establish the following five-year interim goal and ten-year long-term goal regarding the waiting period for patent examination. Holding the waiting period for patent examinations to less than 30 months in 2008 (interim goal), even when the number of applications waiting to be examined expands to 800,000 and the waiting period for patent examinations reaches a peak, and achieving a reduction of the waiting period to 11 months, which will be the highest global standard, in 2013 (long-term goal). | |||
ii) | In order to achieve the interim/long-term goals mentioned above, the GOJ will steadily implement the following measures in FY 2004 and beyond. | |||
a) | Efforts concerning applications and requests for examination | |||
・Promoting the utilization of the system of withdrawal/abandonment of applications (system of partial return of examination request fees) | ||||
・Promoting the utilization of specified, registered search organizations | ||||
・Promoting the utilization of the utility model system | ||||
・Cooperating with companies ranking high in terms of the number of applications filed | ||||
b) | Enriching the personnel system of the Japan Patent Office | |||
・Securing a sufficient number of examiners who are continuously necessary and fixed-term examiners (See note below) who are necessary for the period of the interim goal | ||||
・Utilizing assistants with expertise | ||||
c) | Increasing examination efficiency | |||
・Expanding outsourcing of prior art search to registered search organizations | ||||
・Shifting to outsourcing methods with high examination efficiency | ||||
・Sharing and analyzing examination information by using information technology | ||||
d) | Establishing the foundation necessary for expediting patent examination | |||
・Strengthening the training system for examiners | ||||
・Developing prior art search personnel | ||||
・Improving information services, including the provision of patent information, etc., to the public | ||||
iii) | The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry will formulate an implementation plan for every fiscal year to achieve the interim/long-term goals mentioned above, and report to the Intellectual Property Strategy Headquarters and make public the achievement status every fiscal year. | |||
iv) | The Intellectual Property Strategy Headquarters will carry out comprehensive and multifaceted verification of the report mentioned above and will take necessary measures, such as providing information to persons concerned, inside and outside of the government, and requesting the cooperation of such persons, as appropriate. | |||
(Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) | ||||
Note: The GOJ increased fixed-term examiners by 98 in FY 2004. | ||||
(2) | Developing and Utilizing Prior Art Search Organizations | |||
i) | Amidst calls for the further enhancement of efficiency and quality of search operations aimed at achieving expeditious and accurate patent examination, a proposed Law for the Promotion of Expeditious Patent Examination was submitted to the ordinary session of the Diet in 2004. The objective of the proposed law is to enable not only public-interest corporations but also others to participate in the outsourcing by the Japan Patent Office of prior art search, which is necessary for patent examination. If the proposed law is enacted, from FY 2004, the GOJ will actively promote the participation of private search organizations in order to multiply the number of registered search organizations and expand search operations both quantitatively and qualitatively. In such case, in FY 2004, the GOJ will also establish a system to develop prior art search personnel at the National Center for Industrial Property Information and Training in cooperation with relevant organizations, in order to support private organizations in newly becoming registered search organizations. | |||
ii) | In FY 2004, The GOJ will continue to further enhance efficiency and quality by promoting a shift to a method with high examination efficiency (face-to-face explanation) in the outsourcing of prior art search utilizing registered search organizations. In addition, the GOJ will discuss the utilization of information technology in outsourcing operations in FY 2004. | |||
iii) | If applicants try to file requests for examination after evaluating the possibility of obtaining patent rights, applicants can file requests for examination more appropriately, which will also contribute to the search operations of the Japan Patent Office. Therefore, a proposed Law for the Promotion of Expeditious Patent Examination was submitted to the ordinary session of the Diet in 2004. The objective of the proposed law is to introduce a system in which the examination request fee will be reduced if an applicant submits a prior art search report issued by a specified registered search organization at the time of filing an examination request. If the proposed law is enacted, from FY 2005, the GOJ will promote the provision of prior art search results by applicants. | |||
(Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) | ||||
(3) | Promoting Structural Reform of the Patent Application/Examination Request | |||
i) | In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to request the cooperation of business executives and personnel in charge of intellectual property affairs, especially the business executives of companies ranking high in terms of the number of applications filed, in improving patent application/examination request systems, including the screening of requests for examination in order to raise the patent registration rate, the withdrawal of applications for which obtainment of the patent right is no longer necessary, and the appropriate utilization of the utility model system. | |||
ii) | A system to return part of the examination request fees if applicants withdraw or abandon their applications during the waiting period for examination was established through amendment of the Patent Law in 2003. In addition, in 2004, a proposed Law for the Promotion of Expeditious Patent Examination was submitted to the ordinary session of the Diet. The objective of the proposed law is to introduce a system in which the examination request fee will be reduced if an applicant submits a prior art search report issued by a specified, registered search organization at the time of filing a request for an examination. If the proposed law is enacted, the GOJ will disseminate the system from FY 2004. | |||
iii) | Since patent attorneys play a vital role in assuring the proper obtainment of rights and high-quality specifications, the GOJ will, in FY 2004 and beyond, promote the advertising of support measures for SMEs provided by patent attorneys in terms of the patent system, guidance for prior art search by patent attorneys, and the disclosure and provision of information useful for applicants' selecting patent attorneys, in light of the roles to be played by patent attorneys for the purpose of achieving expeditious and accurate examinations, which were organized by the Intellectual Property Policy Committee of the Industrial Structure Council in FY 2003, with the understanding and cooperation of the Japan Patent Attorneys Association. | |||
iv) | In FY 2004, the GOJ will continue to provide information necessary for companies to improve their filing of patent applications and requests for examination, such as the number of applications by technical field and the rate of patented applications. | |||
(Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) | ||||
(4) | Creating the Environment for Prior Art Search | |||
i) | In FY 2004, the GOJ will provide services of the Industrial Property Digital Library with improved access provided by a more sophisticated server. The GOJ will also continue to make efforts to improve the functions of the Industrial Property Digital Library and enrich the information which is provided. | |||
ii) | In order to strengthen the information service functions necessary to expedite patent examination, in FY 2004, the GOJ will make efforts to disseminate Industrial Property Digital Library services using dedicated lines, which are available at reference rooms at the nationwide National Center for Industrial Property Information (National Center for Industrial Property Information and Training in the case where the proposed Law for the Promotion of Expeditious Patent Examination is enacted) so that the services are effectively utilized. | |||
iii) | In order to promote the active utilization of patent information and other information by corporate intellectual property departments versed in patent information, universities, research institutes, and SMEs with technical capabilities, the GOJ will consider specific measures to create an environment that enables highly functional and high-speed prior art search by using F-term data and other information possessed by the Japan Patent Office in FY 2004, aiming to create such an environment in FY 2005. | |||
iv) | In order to contribute to improving and creating an environment for prior art search, a proposed Law for the Promotion of Expeditious Patent Examination that admits the issuance of official gazettes via the Internet was submitted to the ordinary session of the Diet in 2004. If the proposed law is enacted, the GOJ will promote detailed consideration of the issuing methods in FY 2004, with the aim of realizing the issuance of official gazettes via the Internet in FY 2005. | |||
v) | In FY 2003, the GOJ provided bibliographic data stored in the database (CSDB) used for examining computer-related applications possessed by the Japan Patent Office, in order to promote the implementation of a sufficient prior art search at every stage of R&D, filing patent applications and examination requests. From FY 2004, the GOJ will make efforts to obtain permission to use original documents and abstracts from copyright holders and provide them at the Industrial Property Digital Library upon obtaining such permission. | |||
(Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) |